Re: [PCN] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcn-3-in-1-encoding-11.txt
Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu> Fri, 20 April 2012 11:33 UTC
Return-Path: <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2785721F8746 for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oyxofHI1e9MK for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B17F21F8745 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88252100D85 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:31:08 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3NLNWiI+XmGH for <pcn@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:31:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C609100CC9 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:31:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.1.1.190] (10.1.1.190) by skoll.office.hd (192.168.125.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:33:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4F91496F.3040900@neclab.eu>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:33:03 +0200
From: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pcn@ietf.org
References: <20120420112100.9401.93000.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120420112100.9401.93000.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.1.1.190]
Subject: Re: [PCN] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcn-3-in-1-encoding-11.txt
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:33:10 -0000
Hi, Does this draft address all comments received? I have solicited a last round of feedback from the IESG for this draft, the pcn-sm, and the pcn-cl draft this morning, believing that all drafts are ready. This happened just this morning. I hope to move all three drafts to the RFC editor rather soon, given that no more comments are received. Martin -- IETF Transport Area Director martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 283 On 04/20/2012 01:21 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Congestion and Pre-Congestion Notification Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Encoding 3 PCN-States in the IP header using a single DSCP > Author(s) : Bob Briscoe > Toby Moncaster > Michael Menth > Filename : draft-ietf-pcn-3-in-1-encoding-11.txt > Pages : 28 > Date : 2012-04-20 > > The objective of Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) is to protect the > quality of service (QoS) of inelastic flows within a Diffserv domain. > The overall rate of the PCN-traffic is metered on every link in the > PCN domain, and PCN-packets are appropriately marked when certain > configured rates are exceeded. Egress nodes pass information about > these PCN-marks to decision points which then decide whether to admit > or block new flow requests or to terminate some already-admitted > flows during serious pre-congestion. > > This document specifies how PCN-marks are to be encoded into the IP > header by re-using the Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) > codepoints within a PCN-domain. The PCN wire protocol for non-IP > protocol headers will need to be defined elsewhere. Nonetheless, > this document clarifies the PCN encoding for MPLS in an informational > Appendix. The encoding for IP provides for up to three different PCN > marking states using a single DSCP: Not-marked (NM), Threshold-marked > (ThM) and Excess-traffic-marked (ETM). Hence, it is called the > 3-in-1 PCN encoding. This document obsoletes RFC5696. > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pcn-3-in-1-encoding-11.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pcn-3-in-1-encoding-11.txt > > _______________________________________________ > PCN mailing list > PCN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn
- Re: [PCN] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcn-3-in-1-encod… Martin Stiemerling
- [PCN] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcn-3-in-1-encoding-… internet-drafts