Re: [pcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-04.txt

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2C921F8692 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H6VQP2fk6A5N for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957BD21F8690 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm10.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 8012D2640A9 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:41:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCH61.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.32]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id D0CA64C06F for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:41:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.11]) by PUEXCH61.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.32]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:41:30 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:41:29 +0200
Thread-Topic: [pcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-04.txt
Thread-Index: Ac10nrc/M/qUuVGpTxKNan5dJYkA3gAAD8BA
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E4CD30282@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <20120807131522.10467.31563.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120807131522.10467.31563.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.8.7.101815
Subject: Re: [pcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-04.txt
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:41:45 -0000

Re-,

This version integrates the comments received during the WGLC. 

The main changes are:

* rfc1035 encoding is not used
* indicate rfc3396 mechanism is required for the dhcpv4 option
* remove redundant text to a new sub-section
* update the pcp server discovery section: indicate the procedure is not specific to dhcp

A diff link is available here: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-04

Cheers,
Med

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : pcp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] De la 
>part de internet-drafts@ietf.org
>Envoyé : mardi 7 août 2012 15:15
>À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
>Cc : pcp@ietf.org
>Objet : [pcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-04.txt
>
>
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line 
>Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Port Control Protocol 
>Working Group of the IETF.
>
>	Title           : DHCP Options for the Port Control 
>Protocol (PCP)
>	Author(s)       : Mohamed Boucadair
>                          Reinaldo Penno
>                          Dan Wing
>	Filename        : draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-04.txt
>	Pages           : 12
>	Date            : 2012-08-07
>
>Abstract:
>   This document specifies DHCP (IPv4 and IPv6) options to configure
>   hosts with Port Control Protocol (PCP) Server names.  The use of
>   DHCPv4 or DHCPv6 depends on the PCP deployment scenario.
>
>
>
>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp
>
>There's also a htmlized version available at:
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-04
>
>A diff from the previous version is available at:
>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-04
>
>
>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>_______________________________________________
>pcp mailing list
>pcp@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
>