[pcp] Protocol Action: 'PCP Server Selection' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection-10.txt)

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 26 January 2015 17:22 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150126172236.17141.89151.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:22:36 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/5T_ufFAgBdu3ySI7QsyXgx3k88Y>
Cc: pcp mailing list <pcp@ietf.org>, pcp chair <pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [pcp] Protocol Action: 'PCP Server Selection' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection-10.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'PCP Server Selection'
  (draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection-10.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Port Control Protocol Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Ted Lemon and Brian Haberman.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection/




Technical Summary

The document specifies the behavior to be followed by a Port Control Protocol (PCP)
client to contact its PCP server(s) when one or several PCP server IP addresses
are configured.

> Working Group Summary
>
>  Was there anything in WG process that is worth noting? For 
>  example, was there controversy about particular points or 
>  were there decisions where the consensus was particularly 
>  rough?

Nothing noteworthy.  An earlier version of the doc went through a prior WGLC
and had significant discussion, which resulted in significant changes.  The 
resulting version achieved broad consensus and all subsequent versions since
then have been straightforward and non-contentious.

> Document Quality:
>
>  Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a 
>  significant number of vendors indicated their plan to 
>  implement the specification? 

Unknown.  The spec is applicable to all PCP client implementations,
of which several are known.

Personnel:
Document Shepherd: Dave Thaler
Responsible Area Director: Ted Lemon

[pcp] Protocol Action: 'PCP Server Selection' to … The IESG