[pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 17 August 2012 09:32 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B752C21F8532 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.034
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.034 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.214, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rMA-CVaThOy2 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36D421F8459 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.1]) by omfedm11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 51A233B4621 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:32:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from puexch91.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.48]) by omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 3911B35C045 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:32:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.9]) by puexch91.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.48]) with mapi; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:32:35 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:32:34 +0200
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01
Thread-Index: Ac18Wf38+SHs+qaOSKKGin77Rqi26QAACRFg
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E512B43CD@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <20120817092347.27948.43556.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120817092347.27948.43556.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.8.15.135715
Subject: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:32:59 -0000
Dear all, A new version is now available online: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 The main changes in -01 are as follows: * The reference architecture is updated: the PCP proxy is not restricted to the CP router deployment case. * Add a new section to specify the behaviour when the PCP Proxy is not co-located with a NAT function * Add a new section for mappings repair * More discussion for the multiple PCP Servers scenario * Text is cleanup A detailed diff is available here: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 Please review this new version and provide input. Cheers, Med
- [pcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01.txt internet-drafts
- [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 Zhouqian (Cathy)
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 Zhouqian (Cathy)