IETF Logo Mail Archive

[pcp] Review of draft-ietf-pcp-nat64-prefix64-02

"Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil)" <ssenthil@cisco.com> Fri, 31 May 2013 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ssenthil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A49C21F8EF2 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2013 11:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dtYFAnya1dHj for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2013 11:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB18A21F84F9 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2013 11:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=280; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1370025019; x=1371234619; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=m2Zt/A3ROJP/Rf7NPXELWddJSTfpB53FZpNZaCsWK7I=; b=K4+KSBesR7dQx0AOEYx50qh/kchsPZpR+mkinNufgPHXv5iWStNKCvlv 6Rp4B0l3BYiMdVZDY1oiQaoKgLnAoYtlwPT+juEqRG/Irxo4fsZ+B9mO2 SUUX65sJnsRy5mqjMGhW4+yTO0D7/rretwIANGzlf+WElb+FsFAD97BUL 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhsGANLrqFGtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABagwm/HoEDFm0HgiUBBHkSASpWJQIEDg2IBboLjnAxB4J2YQOIaKAWgw+CJw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,780,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="217336356"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2013 18:30:18 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4VIUI5A024425 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 31 May 2013 18:30:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.5.94]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 31 May 2013 13:30:17 -0500
From: "Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil)" <ssenthil@cisco.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-pcp-nat64-prefix64-02
Thread-Index: AQHOXizllAGNv6BFaUShlQ5KKEfYCg==
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 18:30:16 +0000
Message-ID: <CB1B483277FEC94E9B58357040EE5D0232593E9F@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36ED3A083DC@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416
x-originating-ip: [10.117.198.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <CF4BE4171C9D8041AF376C86D73EDB31@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: [pcp] Review of draft-ietf-pcp-nat64-prefix64-02
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 18:30:24 -0000

Overall, this is a well-written draft and is ready for progressing.
The only comment I have is this document doesn¹t address the multiple
prefixes that could be present on a NAT64 device.
Any guidelines on which prefix should be reported would be useful.

Thanks
Senthil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email