Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01
Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Fri, 17 August 2012 13:04 UTC
Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DD821F8584 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.204
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VNmCzoBELhYa for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ec2-23-21-227-93.compute-1.amazonaws.com (ec2-23-21-227-93.compute-1.amazonaws.com [23.21.227.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D9D21F8575 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-217-126-210.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.217.126.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0355209C0; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:04:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id CDE4A4350; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:04:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
References: <20120817092347.27948.43556.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E512B43CD@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:04:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E512B43CD@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> (mohamed boucadair's message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:32:34 +0200")
Message-ID: <tslboi93c0u.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:04:46 -0000
I was not aware of the proxy draft. We're going to have to carefully consider the interactions between the proxy and the authentication mechanism and the PCP base security models. --Sam
- [pcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01.txt internet-drafts
- [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 Zhouqian (Cathy)
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [pcp] draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-01 Zhouqian (Cathy)