IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-02 comments due by NOV 10

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 31 October 2014 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90ABC1A8AD4 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id otoyUPqyiWZV for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias244.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.244]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F6391A8AD1 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.200]) by omfeda12.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id DDE3E3B4477; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 07:38:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.5]) by omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id B0EB61580B3; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 07:38:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([169.254.2.110]) by OPEXCLILH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 07:38:40 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Sebastian Kiesel <ietf-pcp@skiesel.de>, Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-02 comments due by NOV 10
Thread-Index: AQHP9JAsjbtRQZoM9ESIT32rcg6eM5xJwKdA
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:38:40 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93301C3055@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <0d54be2504534facaaaddfb275ba982d@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93301C2474@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20141030111132.GC5297@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de> <CANO7kWATnxjaMh+SaMphZHYzEDKVMzB3SWqfntJrU1MwvGzQVA@mail.gmail.com> <20141030222343.GD5297@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de>
In-Reply-To: <20141030222343.GD5297@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.10.30.153920
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/a6MnCsfKl2qK2p-LErGU-KhA9Og
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-02 comments due by NOV 10
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:38:44 -0000

Dear Sebastien,

Looks good to me. Thanks.

Cheers,
Med

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Sebastian Kiesel [mailto:ietf-pcp@skiesel.de] 
Envoyé : jeudi 30 octobre 2014 23:24
À : Simon Perreault
Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; pcp@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [pcp] WGLC: draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-02 comments due by NOV 10

What would be the text proposal for that change?

Old:

   The PCP client SHOULD select the PCP anycast address to be of the
   same IP address family as its requested PCP mapping, i.e., the
   address family of the Requested Internal IP Address.

New:

   The PCP client selects the IP address family as specified
   in [draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection].


What do you think?


Thanks
Sebastian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email