Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 13 September 2012 15:26 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C8F21F859B for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lQKQZsmdCh2h for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C4C121F852D for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2012 15:26:13 -0000
Received: from a88-115-216-191.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.111]) [88.115.216.191] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 13 Sep 2012 17:26:13 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+fQm9KuBmfvqEFn2wXKSSf7C94LeDBauWkTY/TnQ HB9kf5edtlQJvi
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120913145755.6952gmx1@mx075.gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:26:11 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1B150C40-51A4-4BD9-8915-2F9BC54B5BB9@gmx.net>
References: <20120913145755.6952gmx1@mx075.gmx.net>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: pcp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:26:16 -0000
Hi Sam, I wonder why you care about PCP at all. You are neither someone who ships operating systems nor someone who provides network equipment (like a NAT or a firewall). You seem to be willing to spend a lot of time on that topic and I am curious where this interest comes from. Ciao Hannes On Sep 13, 2012, at 5:57 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > hi. > So, as I mentioned earlier I'm either in the camp of strongly > preferring PCP-specific authentication or in the camp of not caring much > at all. > > I'd kind of like to find out which camp I'm in by the 21st. > > My nervousness is about implementation complexity. I would like to see > PCP authentication be something that can easily be implemented with > open-source libraries. I know how to do that if we use an EAP library > directly. I've managed projects doing something quite similar and I > understand the implementation complexity. > > Would people familiar with PANA implementation be willing to suggest > which implementation I should look at? I'd prefer to look at one, but if > there's disagreement I'd be happy to look at two. > I'm sure you've done your analysis on this point but I'll feel more > comfortable if I do my own. > > I'll be happy to share my conclusions as I suspect that there are other > WG participants who care about implementation complexity. > > If there are open-source PCP servers I'd be happy to glance at those > just to see how things like memory management, event loop and state > management line up. > > --Sam > _______________________________________________ > pcp mailing list > pcp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Reinaldo Penno (repenno)
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Dan Wing
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider Margaret Wasserman
- [pcp] Authentication scenarios (was Re: PANA impl… Alper Yegin
- [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was Re: P… Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: [pcp] Authentication scenarios (was Re: PANA … Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] [ Side-by-side or nested protocols Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] Authentication scenarios (was Re: PANA … Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Reinaldo Penno (repenno)
- Re: [pcp] [ Side-by-side or nested protocols Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Alper Yegin
- [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Zhangdacheng (Dacheng)
- Re: [pcp] [ Side-by-side or nested protocols Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Margaret Wasserman
- [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Reinaldo Penno (repenno)
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] Side-by-side or nested protocols (was R… Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] EAP-over-PCP Alper Yegin
- [pcp] EAP retransmits and re-authentication Sam Hartman
- [pcp] gss-eap Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] EAP retransmits and re-authentication Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] EAP retransmits and re-authentication Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] EAP retransmits and re-authentication Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] EAP retransmits and re-authentication Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] EAP retransmits and re-authentication Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] EAP retransmits and re-authentication Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] EAP retransmits and re-authentication Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] EAP retransmits and re-authentication Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] EAP retransmits and re-authentication Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] gss-eap & client-side rexmit only Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] gss-eap & client-side rexmit only Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [pcp] gss-eap & client-side rexmit only Sam Hartman
- Re: [pcp] gss-eap & client-side rexmit only Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [pcp] gss-eap & client-side rexmit only Alper Yegin