IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 09 July 2015 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4061B2A55; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JHSZYEq0OgHC; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7152D1B2A4B; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0643BE83; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:11:32 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DUMV3vLi3NKs; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:11:32 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BED9BBE80; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:11:32 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1436454692; bh=OXO2EjJoJaC4uTTDw/r8AtAdT66qo3uR62sRUnNz0tw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M/bXNgYbe0f0N/Tw8u+NFGIvNDgftXC5HF/gJUjAcPPG4kCqlvy7JduvaSiWMa5Bj vVzcc3I824eNrg3lVfm/myCRb3S5GBt6Sr+lasobHT4tYPKtLW1ZUX52lTT5iL/1/9 p6Sl0eHzzihSUER0XXcPyshBcgK3+3eoQOYixJM8=
Message-ID: <559E8F24.9000404@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 16:11:32 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150709111801.11716.51471.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A4788BBAD@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A4788BBAD@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/otCZE8kqTzhK53FDEm94u5NDjmI>
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:11:37 -0000


On 09/07/15 16:08, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote:
> It was discussed in the PCP WG if PCP confidentiality is required and the outcome was encryption of PCP messages is not required.

Do you have a pointer to that discussion? I'd be interested
in the logic.

Thanks,
S.

PS: The rest is fine.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email