Re: [pcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option-05.txt

Rolf Winter <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu> Sun, 17 January 2016 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBA81A889B for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:50:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9zdKYtLztHBi for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:50:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA60A1A889A for <pcp@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:50:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE6110BED9 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:50:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3Fx-FfkN6jU for <pcp@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:50:38 +0100 (CET)
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 812DB10BED8 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:50:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PALLENE.office.hd ([169.254.1.84]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:50:15 +0100
From: Rolf Winter <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu>
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRUURQTUyEitJtV0WV0SfMv2TRK57/61Cw
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 16:50:14 +0000
Message-ID: <791AD3077F94194BB2BDD13565B6295DA9CE7967@PALLENE.office.hd>
References: <20160117162950.4793.45710.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160117162950.4793.45710.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.7.0.197]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/rFB_MrMvhkwn1-Dme71wLgixB1o>
Subject: Re: [pcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option-05.txt
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 16:50:41 -0000

Hi everybody,

this version has a number of changes implemented to address the discusses it received during the IESG review. 

Best,

Rolf

NEC Europe Ltd | Registered Office: Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End  Road, London, HA4 6QE, GB | Registered in England 2832014


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pcp [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
> drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Sonntag, 17. Januar 2016 17:30
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: pcp@ietf.org
> Subject: [pcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option-05.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Port Control Protocol Working Group
> of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : PCP Third Party ID Option
>         Authors         : Andreas Ripke
>                           Rolf Winter
>                           Thomas Dietz
>                           Juergen Quittek
>                           Rafael Lopez da Silva
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option-05.txt
> 	Pages           : 14
> 	Date            : 2016-01-17
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document describes a new Port Control Protocol (PCP) option
>    called THIRD_PARTY_ID option.  It is designed to be used together
>    with the THIRD_PARTY option specified in RFC 6887.
> 
>    The THIRD_PARTY_ID option serves to identify a third party in
>    situations where a third party's IP address contained in the
>    THIRD_PARTY option does not provide sufficient information to create
>    requested mappings in a PCP-controlled device.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option-05
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pcp-third-party-id-option-
> 05
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp