Re: [pcp] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13: (with COMMENT)

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Thu, 09 July 2015 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBE41B2A93; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GEqJl5pIr9Z8; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFC861B2A8F; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1014; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1436456306; x=1437665906; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=SeYjQ9A7uXalssKoSgi0DloLpUFdFavN+rkxOQdAP20=; b=WLV/0yftWyiKNOYsWCCBHU6tYBmCCi+OjpPJERUadSM5AawHF4hAxxNY CUoFneNNunfAUVXRphb4PlJXy2pZnpLsvUTcarzF4XgceJSZ6KlA0Krhe 12KSu+RiKAZwFsNrdx3jQ+hHwTBU2aaiu4DEhQXJuDfbp/v1RWXbpkeh2 g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CnBQBElJ5V/5pdJa1bgxJUYAaDGrgJgXGFdwIcgT05EwEBAQEBAQGBCoQjAQEBAwEjEUUMBgEIEQQBAQECAgYdAwIEMBQBCAkBBAENBQiIHggNA7h0liQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIEhiiqEVRYbDYJiL4EUAQSULQGEZqAAJmOBWoE+b4FHgQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,440,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="10273905"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2015 15:38:26 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t69FcPTP009175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:38:26 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.123]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([173.37.183.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:38:25 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AdC6XUht7NOBiY+WQJ+E530a17ACow==
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:38:24 +0000
Message-ID: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A4788BC91@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.44.176]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/rkOi2L9-483nuWOo8yfNbB8Cmh8>
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:38:28 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie]
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 8:42 PM
> To: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy); The IESG
> Cc: pcp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pcp] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pcp-
> authentication-13: (with COMMENT)
> 
> 
> 
> On 09/07/15 16:08, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote:
> > It was discussed in the PCP WG if PCP confidentiality is required and the
> outcome was encryption of PCP messages is not required.
> 
> Do you have a pointer to that discussion? I'd be interested in the logic.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/jcBLB5ERyqTYhe6LHKHVTh7z3vk 

Cheers,
-Tiru

> 
> Thanks,
> S.
> 
> PS: The rest is fine.