Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG

In addition to PCP Authentication other pending WG documents should also be taken to completion.  I see various interesting individual drafts like draft-boucadair-pcp-sfc-classifier-control-00, draft-chen-pcp-authentication-sim-00 etc. it seems too early to close the WG.

-Tiru

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Wing (dwing)
> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 2:03 AM
> To: Margaret Wasserman
> Cc: pcp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG
> 
> On Jul 18, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Margaret Wasserman <margaretw42@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Reinaldo,
> >
> > I think we should send the PCP Security document to WG last call before
> closing the working group.  The work is nearly complete, and hopefully a last call
> would thresh out any remaining issues.  I would strongly prefer that we do not
> declare the PCP work to be complete without any published security solution.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> -d
> 
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Margaret
> >
> >
> > On Jul 17, 2014, at 1:50 AM, Reinaldo Penno (repenno) <repenno@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The chairs and AD have been discussing the lack of activity on the
> >> mailing list compounded with the low number of agenda requests and
> >> lack of any agenda requests for WG documents.
> >>
> >> Therefore we propose that after Server Selection and Anycast drafts
> >> are done it would be a good point to close the WG. This has been a
> >> very successful WG, we delivered what was in the original charter,
> >> adapted quickly to incorporate new documents and delivered those.
> >>
> >>
> >> Furthermore we would propose to hold a webex interim meeting in lieu
> >> of the f2f meeting at the IETF. The WebEx interim meeting will be
> >> scheduled to occur shortly after WGLC completes on the Server
> >> Selection draft, and we plan to start the WGLC shortly.
> >>
> >> The two agenda requests we received for discussion of new individual
> >> drafts would be deferred to the interim meeting.
> >>
> >> If you feel that closing the WG is premature, we need to see real
> >> progress on other WG documents.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Reinaldo, Dave & Ted.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pcp mailing list
> >> pcp@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pcp mailing list
> > pcp@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
> 