Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG

On Jul 18, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Margaret Wasserman <margaretw42@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Reinaldo,
> 
> I think we should send the PCP Security document to WG last call before closing the working group.  The work is nearly complete, and hopefully a last call would thresh out any remaining issues.  I would strongly prefer that we do not declare the PCP work to be complete without any published security solution.

Agreed.

-d

> 
> Thanks,
> Margaret
> 
> 
> On Jul 17, 2014, at 1:50 AM, Reinaldo Penno (repenno) <repenno@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> The chairs and AD have been discussing the lack of activity on the mailing
>> list compounded with the low number of agenda requests and lack of any
>> agenda requests for WG documents.
>> 
>> Therefore we propose that after Server Selection and Anycast drafts are
>> done it would be a good point to close the WG. This has been a very
>> successful WG, we delivered what was in the original charter, adapted
>> quickly to incorporate new documents and delivered those.
>> 
>> 
>> Furthermore we would propose to hold a webex interim meeting in lieu of
>> the f2f meeting at the IETF. The WebEx interim meeting will be scheduled
>> to occur shortly after WGLC completes on the Server Selection draft, and
>> we plan to start the WGLC shortly.
>> 
>> The two agenda requests we received for discussion of new individual
>> drafts would be deferred to the interim meeting.
>> 
>> If you feel that closing the WG is premature, we need to see real progress
>> on other WG documents.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Reinaldo, Dave & Ted.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pcp mailing list
>> pcp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp