Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: The Port Control Protocol in Dual-Stack Lite environments

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Thu, 16 May 2013 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C2F21F9057 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 04:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6nVkzVMcnq0p for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 04:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F66F21F8F41 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 04:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1180; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1368703873; x=1369913473; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=TSva5FIHb6Qgjyh/k7XAOm4jXdH5sQCIrsy+uLZHhuc=; b=FehW4DClMngwmQvYwo+Y1ScUlw0eXecLgRqfp7gegzLGwfsYSiUsa15D NPxIEOVdIyheST6TpCbhsZTY21rlF1mcKRPA/FYuR+8TD9rX7EIVMHiwU Gaqq6XZ45hVkIO46LvYED1OOju5so0XX3xszXgeyy1bxcsce7ocrsFJ+w M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFAGbClFGtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABbgwc3wUF+FnSCIQEEAQEBGh00HQEIDgISFDcLJQIEARIIiAQMvSyNXIEROIJ0YQOYXJAWgViBOIFxNQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,683,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="211226531"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 May 2013 11:31:13 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4GBVCPu024252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 11:31:12 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.77]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 16 May 2013 06:31:12 -0500
From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr>, "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: The Port Control Protocol in Dual-Stack Lite environments
Thread-Index: AQHOTW4IzNGJjcrb4keUc9T3WaRLF5kGcj4AgAFmJYA=
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:31:12 +0000
Message-ID: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F060409086207@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <51936CDE.6000001@forthnetgroup.gr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
x-originating-ip: [10.86.246.143]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4AE22DFA3C4CF64D9BD741C472CC21A1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: The Port Control Protocol in Dual-Stack Lite environments
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:31:18 -0000

On 5/15/13 8:09 AM, "Tassos Chatzithomaoglou" <achatz@forthnetgroup.gr>
wrote:

>Support, although it's not very clear to me why PCP proxy is the only
>option examined/described.
>Do we assume that all applications and end systems will support PCP?


>Can't B4 be just a PCP client, taking instructions for mappings through
>cli or gui?

Good point, this is not covered in the document. It might also need tweaks
in the security section.

>
>--
>Tassos
>
>Reinaldo Penno (repenno) wrote on 10/05/2013 14:03:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting
>>
>>      Title     : The Port Control Protocol in Dual-Stack Lite
>>environments
>>      Author(s) : F. Dupont t al.
>>      URL       : http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dupont-pcp-dslite-05
>>
>> Please read the current revision and state you opinion either for or
>> against adoption (and with reasoning why) in the mailing list.
>>
>> The call for adoption ends 24th May 2013.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Reinaldo
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pcp mailing list
>> pcp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
>>
>