Re: [Pearg] Proposed virtual interim on IP address privacy

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF37B3A10F3 for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:10:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2UKrui4yinAX for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 133083A10E9 for <pearg@irtf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECE2C6A305; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:10:39 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1605597040; bh=W0eOr5n8djFptnW6aEQAxDt7Y8VuhnEM7l4lN/pdi9M=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=KDdze3ThF1hnyxNtPK3XLlscCrlL59JFbdCbTGRI1np2HBwJonM9rypavJwnnIaXG TIlcyL/g3WQGIR7vDHhSRd7MIEm4zUQrMOfOprJp2mj2wAdU7wXuVCD0UMgozX7QJm Yd/vKNYXQRxWNh0HbVlMeH7drCtdLR6RjvEQwKtyqtJB0OK3jIlcfTRhdh8uJKFORS NCeSWhTH0m63rC0+KxtNhETFq9UhwB3KCADuBCK8WJ2Rvtig1so0z6Sn8v9pebKi9k YjQs4Rc5wpJ1yF603bXUGDMm2Oxa+zuG1X43Ac5dJHtsv6IOWWYUMEV5HmWZxBYcCx 6qXA7RhsQvHjg==
Received: from appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com (appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDC8E3C01B0; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:10:39 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:10:39 +0100
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>, pearg@irtf.org
Message-ID: <1202974683.41350.1605597039808@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <30bff6c4-fca5-480e-93fb-c6d0b5510148@www.fastmail.com>
References: <30bff6c4-fca5-480e-93fb-c6d0b5510148@www.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev10
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Autocrypt: addr=vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFhFR+UBCACfoywFKBRfzasiiR9/6dwY36eLePXcdScumDMR8qoXvRS55QYDjp5bs+yMq41qWV9 xp/cqryY9jnvHbeF3TsE5yEazpD1dleRbkpElUBpPwXqkrSP8uXO9KkS9KoX6gdml6M4L+F82WpqYC1 uTzOE6HPmhmQ4cGSgoia2jolxAhRpzoYN99/BwpvoZeTSLP5K6yPlMPYkMev/uZlAkMMhelli9IN6yA yxcC0AeHSnOAcNKUr13yXyMlTyi1cdMJ4sk88zIbefxwg3PAtYjkz3wgvP96cNVwAgSt4+j/ZuVaENP pgVuM512m051j9SlspWDHtzrci5pBKKFsibnTelrABEBAAG0NUJlcnRvbGEsIFZpdHRvcmlvIDx2aXR 0b3Jpby5iZXJ0b2xhQG9wZW4teGNoYW5nZS5jb20+iQFABBMBAgAqBAsJCAcGFQoJCAsCBRYCAwEAAp 4BAhsDBYkSzAMABQMAAAAABYJYRUflAAoJEIU2cHmzj8qNaG0H/ROY+suCP86hoN+9RIV66Ej8b3sb8 UgwFJOJMupZfeb9yTIJwE4VQT5lTt146CcJJ5jvxD6FZn1Htw9y4/45pPAF7xLE066jg3OqRvzeWRZ3 IDUfJJIiM5YGk1xWxDqppSwhnKcMOuI72iioWxX0nGQrWxpnWJsjt08IEEwuYucDkul1PHsrLJbTd58 fiMKLVwag+IE1SPHOwkPF6arZQZIfB5ThtOZV+36Jn8Hok9XfeXWBVyPkiWCQYVX39QsIbr0JNR9kQy 4g2ZFexOcTe8Jo12jPRL7V8OqStdDes3cje9lWFLnX05nrfLuE0l0JKWEg8akN+McFXc+oV68h7nu5A Q0EWEVH5QEIAIDKanNBe1uRfk8AjLirflZO291VNkOAeUu+dIhecGnZeQW6htlDinlYOnXhtsY1mK9W PUu+xshDq7lXn2G0LxldYwyJYZaJtDgIKqVqwxfA34Lj27oqPuXwcvGhdCgt0SW/YcalRdAi0/AzUCu 5GSaj2kaGUSnBYYUP4szGJXjaK2psP5toQSCtx2pfSXQ6MaqPK9Zzy+D5xc6VWQRp/iRImodAcPf8fg JJvRyJ8Jla3lKWyvBBzJDg6MOf6Fts78bJSt23X0uPp93g7GgbYkuRMnFI4RGoTVkxjD/HBEJ0CNg22 hoHJondhmKnZVrHEluFuSnW0wBEIYomcPSPB+cAEQEAAYkBMQQYAQIAGwUCWEVH5QIbDAQLCQgHBhUK CQgLAgUJEswDAAAKCRCFNnB5s4/KjdO8B/wNpvWtOpLdotR/Xh4fu08Fd63nnNfbIGIETWsVi0Sbr8i E5duuGaaWIcMmUvgKe/BM0Fpj9X01Zjm90uoPrlVVuQWrf+vFlbalUYVZr51gl5UyUFHk+iAZCAA0WB rsmACKvuV1P7GuiX3UV9b59T9taYJxN3dNFuftrEuvsqHimFtlekUjUwoCekTJdncFusBhwz2OrKhHr WWrEsXkfh0+pURWYAlKlTxvXuI7gAfHEQM+6OnrWvXYtlhd0M1sBPnCjbyG63Qws7Rek9bEWKtH6dA6 dmT2FQT+g1S9Mdf0WkPTQNX0x24dm8IoHuD3KYwX7Svx43Xa17aZnXqUjtj1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/-TJxg1UDQEcwLyBTFQ22G2lH0wo>
Subject: Re: [Pearg] Proposed virtual interim on IP address privacy
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 07:10:46 -0000


> Il 13/11/2020 18:23 Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> ha scritto:
> 
>  
> The PEARG chairs would like to propose a virtual interim on the topic of IP address privacy. 
> 
> IP address uses: 
> - Spam, abuse, fraud, DoS protection
> - Geo IP
> - Ad targeting
> - ... others?
> 
> Privacy attacks:
> - IP re-identification
> - IP-based fingerprinting
> 
> IP hiding or blindness:
> - VPNs (and related technologies like Firefox Private Network)
> - Willful IP Blindness (https://github.com/bslassey/ip-blindness)
> 
> The format of this would be presentation-based, though we might turn it into a workshop of sorts if folks think that would be more useful.
> 
> We are aiming for some time in early December or January. We'd like to hear from folks here if they'd be interested in attending such an interim, and if so, whether they'd like to contribute to the agenda. Of course, suggestions to alter the agenda are also welcome!

Thanks to today's dnsop session, I just realized how much work is going on to create large scale automated mechanisms for distributing and updating lists of associations between IP addresses and physical locations, potentially up to the level of a postal code. So yes, I think that it is quite necessary to discuss how to prevent this from becoming a real-time directory of where each fixed line Internet user is, and I'd be happy to join.

-- 
Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com 
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy