IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pearg] Call for Adoption: Two drafts on Numeric IDs

Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> Fri, 23 August 2019 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sara@sinodun.com>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8090B120142 for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sinodun.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RLPvK4zgmxKI for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 037CE120026 for <pearg@irtf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sinodun.com ; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:Subject:From; bh=gwmx9aDKAywjlLhbEvedbbbFSItccorvjY6HP4FNfEg=; b=eNh96t1yKXuGeH/wMikFY7NrX7 bCgaAQGcatGenMa2tsv71nMKf+s6541ZiG3ZLkUHeTJyAdVB7KKyShuT/1C31QwEqez9gSYaS8dFN LWv0vBzQ3PRe7ZHu27cyXCbA5lAH9itf2QXHgt+xTsaiWSBLoTBXjSqbRVF9D+0pjT6ZtRIzTqZTZ gCrw2FytJHe/iivrwk4aaIHMUe4veL8qpyxhW4TRl1M2zxrZLbgth9lydb8rbifBiUc1aLvhyEsN4 gNByKDqUGHYeAbt+e0y6ZfTY0SgLi7NQ60ELeuqsfznACafF23UTQrUG8xtXlNV/elmpWeIHezeTt YqgOaBoA==;
Received: from [2001:b98:204:102:fffa::41e7] (port=64353) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <sara@sinodun.com>) id 1i18cO-0003Az-MD for pearg@irtf.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 13:24:40 +0100
From: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 13:24:36 +0100
References: <7973027D-7548-446D-9F88-D7863514C177@sinodun.com>
To: pearg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <7973027D-7548-446D-9F88-D7863514C177@sinodun.com>
Message-Id: <B11ACDF4-A265-4556-815B-983E72046156@sinodun.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/9TIkE8uFGMafYMKTW0CL2MNgGkw>
Subject: Re: [Pearg] Call for Adoption: Two drafts on Numeric IDs
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 12:24:44 -0000

Hi All, 

Many thanks to those who responded. The chairs have agreed that there is enough support to adopt both drafts, with further discussion expected on whether they should be combined into one document or not. 

Regards

Sara. 

> On 7 Aug 2019, at 12:56, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All, 
> 
> There are currently 3 drafts related to Numeric IDs that have been discussed on various IETF/IRTF lists:
> 
> * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-numeric-ids-history
> * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-numeric-ids-generation
> * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations
> 
> 
> This email starts a two week Call for Adoption for two of these drafts which have been proposed as suitable work for PEARG:
> 
> 1) Unfortunate History of Transient Numeric Identifiers: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-numeric-ids-history-05
> 
> 2) On the Generation of Transient Numeric Identifiers: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-numeric-ids-generation-04
> 
> Please review both these draft to see if you think they are suitable for adoption by PEARG and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
> 
> ** Because they are so closely related, we are requesting that people send an initial single response to this email but state their opinion separately for each of the above drafts in that response ** 
> 
> Note that the third draft is currently in the IETF stream as an AD sponsored submisssion.
> 
> This call for adoption ends on 21st August 2019.
> 
> Sara. 
> -- 
> Pearg mailing list
> Pearg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email