Re: [Pearg] [Maprg] Guidelines for Performing Safe Measurement on the Internet

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 11 December 2018 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4BE1277CC; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 06:03:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 17.5
X-Spam-Level: *****************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_SBL=20, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGmfgELGphNa; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 06:03:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4496F12D4E9; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 06:03:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eggert.org (unknown [62.248.255.8]) by emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412B9400AE; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:03:47 +0200 (EET)
Received: from slate.eggert.org (pf.eggert.org [172.16.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E38B88434B2; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:03:39 +0200 (EET)
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <E3C71B6B-1942-4168-8BE7-765AF98C6665@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0800BF20-AFF3-4DF0-99ED-2CABA11390EF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:03:39 +0200
In-Reply-To: <fb1405de-8944-654a-0292-783aa14769eb@torproject.org>
Cc: maprg@irtf.org
To: pearg@irtf.org
References: <fb1405de-8944-654a-0292-783aa14769eb@torproject.org>
X-MailScanner-ID: E38B88434B2.A23A6
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/DmkVrF288LdmMG4e4ocsXfTpHF8>
Subject: Re: [Pearg] [Maprg] Guidelines for Performing Safe Measurement on the Internet
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:03:57 -0000

Hi,

there is a ton of prior work in this space. See http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2015/netethics.php for starters. I am sure there are other PAM or IMC keynotes or presentations on this. It would be useful to build on this prior work.

Lars

On 2018-12-11, at 12:39, Iain Learmonth <irl@torproject.org> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> Hi All,
> 
> -- This message was originally sent to the PEARG list, please send
> replies there.
> 
> I have just submitted a draft containing the start of some guidelines
> for performing safe measurement on the Internet. This should hopefully
> soon appear as:
>  draft-learmonth-pearg-safe-internet-measurement-00
> 
> For now, you can see the submitted text at:
> 
> https://people.torproject.org/~irl/volatile/draft-learmonth-pearg-safe-internet-measurement-00.txt
> 
> I am happy to receive any comments you may have. This draft draws on the
> Tor Research Safety Board's considerations when considering research on
> the Tor network. I have previously worked on large scale Internet
> measurement studies and my hope is to bring these two things together
> into a useful resource for others that would like to perform Internet
> measurements.
> 
> My Internet measurement background is primarily in functional testing as
> opposed to performance testing, so comments in that area would be
> particularly useful.
> 
> This is by no means a finished document I just wanted to get this out
> there and start collecting feedback as soon as I could.
> 
> Thanks,
> Iain.
> 
> 
>