IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pearg] Proposed virtual interim on IP address privacy

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 07:47 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B21D3A118B for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:47:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FIIDVq60cVMW for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 989363A1187 for <pearg@irtf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:47:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8707; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1605599264; x=1606808864; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=bpU/yKB7B8uT32vGZiVDoDTcOSkeDb5xl/R9snNiIl4=; b=PBops47K9S+gbmh4yjyXb2GLrx0H3qFLigafAZNGEPLfClxLSVCdU6WB wmpgKoYWHMUa8bRuZ1jOgwMLFlRn6H+fBCOeeVhANyuAje+vMJmjKlZQj weBgychyCjL0b2dYfxxnTIJg8LD+9d9r450kfXkwlQr3xVw89V79PzIea k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: A0BvBABmf7Nf/xbLJq1iHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBQIFPgSNSNUmBAAEgEi6NQYggh2qMKogZBAcBAQEKAwEBLwQBAYRKAoIiJjgTAgMBAQEDAgMBAQEBBQEBAQIBBgRxhW2FcgEBAQMBaw4FCwsYLlcGE4MmAYJmIK1IdIE0hVeEWBCBOIFTi14qggCBESccgiEuPogIgiwEnEWbboJ3gxuBN4siiyQDH6F5sESDZAIEBgUCFYFrI4FXMxoIGxVlAYI+PhIZDZxpQAMwNwIGCgEBAwmOSAEB
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,484,1596499200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="31176916"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 17 Nov 2020 07:47:40 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-99-159.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-99-159.cisco.com [10.61.99.159]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0AH7lceX029083 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 07:47:40 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <0876C3DE-62F4-410B-9F68-9A5FBFC5CA7B@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_826A74BD-3C8E-426A-8EB6-CC1A7045A3CB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:47:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <ff309673-23c9-0cdb-e960-cc34db735e9a@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>, pearg@irtf.org
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <30bff6c4-fca5-480e-93fb-c6d0b5510148@www.fastmail.com> <ff309673-23c9-0cdb-e960-cc34db735e9a@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.99.159, dhcp-10-61-99-159.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/N7Q6zjH0YQRCmKOC4gyrUjUdMwk>
Subject: Re: [Pearg] Proposed virtual interim on IP address privacy
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 07:47:46 -0000


> On 16 Nov 2020, at 21:16, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> One topic I'd like to see covered is: when is one person's
> use-case another person's abuse-case? ISTM the exact same
> behaviour can be judged as fine or abusive depending on the
> circumstances and actors involved. I think it'd be good to
> try be more explicitly aware of that and to maybe consider
> if there's a preponderance of evidence for one view or the
> other in some cases.

Another way of putting this is that there are legitimate reasons to want to know who is it that is DOSing me, and who do I contact?  Early work on take downs and Pharma spam has shown that sometimes time is of the essence in order to kill economic incentives for poor behavior.  So what does this mean in terms of privacy?  I can talk a little about this, but the experts are really in Cambridge and at UCSD.

Eliot

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status