Re: [Pearg] Call for Adoption: draft-hall-censorship-tech-07

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 13 August 2019 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C976B1200D6 for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sIWIOpXg_klI for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D9FE12020A for <pearg@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467J230SyczF9S; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:24:11 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1565713451; bh=jbGXSzWmsIhuh9mbMlbsl2G94zYKRSg/niMF0TcL0yM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=H+WCmTjO6DiY3GIc4OfEwGZw68NXmaHr5mtGvPs97ej95d2qKT3JUVr9pC4fehK2r zDRExq/0LhT/DkM9Cx2gFQi+9bv6AK5t+TXMGO4M2yDr7KAxwJFfoOQ81yPH0pImmH PSt+lFEwrwMRfS1z4myyNWXr1KjgGNh2zRsYiY2w=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I4a6_b7Ub2TH; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:24:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:24:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1EEE9353F92; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:24:08 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 1EEE9353F92
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1531241932CB; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:24:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:24:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
cc: pearg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <29CB0337-3B43-4E25-8CFC-F22361863111@sinodun.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1908131220310.1668@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <29CB0337-3B43-4E25-8CFC-F22361863111@sinodun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/PJuBrvdtR4b-FRhsKzZybPX90v8>
Subject: Re: [Pearg] Call for Adoption: draft-hall-censorship-tech-07
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:24:16 -0000

On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Sara Dickinson wrote:

> Following a positive hum on this draft at IETF 105, this email starts a two week Call for Adoption of 'A Survey of Worldwide Censorship Techniques'
>
> The draft is available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hall-censorship-tech-07

In favour of adoption.

I'm not sure I like the list of "three elements of censorship" but I
need to spend more time on this document to give proper feedback. But
to me the term "prescription" is new and not immediate obvious.

Paul