IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pearg] Research Group Last Call for "A Survey of Worldwide Censorship Techniques"

"S. Moonesamy" <sm+sdo@afrinic.net> Wed, 01 July 2020 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@afrinic.net>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9975B3A0AAB for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 06:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3pzrf4JcYGhO for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 06:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from board.afrinic.net (board.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:42d0:0:404::83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC95E3A0AA1 for <pearg@irtf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 06:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [102.115.171.75] (port=59744 helo=DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.afrinic.net) by board.afrinic.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <sm@afrinic.net>) id 1jqcVc-0003WN-Oh for pearg@irtf.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 17:10:40 +0400
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200701055337.0d575238@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 06:09:06 -0700
To: pearg@irtf.org
From: "S. Moonesamy" <sm+sdo@afrinic.net>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR06MB6451000D6397DFE09F93BB26B16E0@BY5PR06MB6451.nampr d06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <08f43a37-2b7b-418e-95a8-ed57484c66be@www.fastmail.com> <3eba505f-8e85-472c-b22a-660c6ec697c1@www.fastmail.com> <BY5PR06MB6451CAEC5B1CF4FC2C32432EB1860@BY5PR06MB6451.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <3ed2d30b-9a8d-432f-273e-f2ca183f0f22@andersdotter.cc> <BY5PR06MB6451000D6397DFE09F93BB26B16E0@BY5PR06MB6451.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/XbHiAcRQiUvOWjxHTKcTZHpw6rQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 10:39:08 -0700
Subject: Re: [Pearg] Research Group Last Call for "A Survey of Worldwide Censorship Techniques"
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:10:49 -0000

Hello,

Section 1 of draft-irtf-pearg-censorship-01 states that the "document 
describes the technical mechanisms that censorship regimes around the 
world use to block or degrade Internet traffic ..."  There is the 
following statement in Section 3.1: "Regional/Local Internet 
Registries (RIRs) that issue Route Origination Authorizations (ROAs) 
to BGP operators can be forced to issue rogue certificates that may 
allow compromises in confidentiality guarantees".

Is there any information about a Regional Internet Registry which was 
forced the issue a Route Origin Authorization to compromise 
"confidentiality guarantees"?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email