Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-hall-censorship-tech
Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Thu, 23 May 2019 10:59 UTC
Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B22B1200B3 for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.245
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.245 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_PHARMACY=1, ONLINE_PHARMACY=0.65, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_VISIT_PHARMA=1.406] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y_9Qa0AdvGw8 for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 004A0120019 for <pearg@irtf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D64626A34D; Thu, 23 May 2019 12:58:59 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1558609139; bh=+UYNGNiN7uzuwnhssrFyGejRp7iOY5IIi/ULTI33oWg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=5rPy750PVVXCkptmKeB/O2sPRC6QHRIYgf0TGN5YcaP2YRBOal08iyx+Apg8q2nUh O2v5OsC0mPxKdrkNFBDM/885p9yIBilqAUWidLXqmJXgdIp4mgo6ehQlR22vvWRrM4 ZWotX+YGtRd3SL67VHsKy3M4Rql3I9QNTmMtk1AiEWA8SWxCcnIBTqM3gDfFp+iCp+ Gj+7FJxc2a/FDv4PdVnZNkltHVsCvKXkok/eFi67vmaywxvQXjKYiKhV64IzarJDEX jJl8cznzr4qP0sLHEEH9V5273/XMvoQvmkJsUE9CgZzlzZR9/EwKyGIm/pTuOokI0B l3ib4K9iG6HNw==
Received: from appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com (appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9CBE3C01D0; Thu, 23 May 2019 12:58:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 12:58:59 +0200
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
Reply-To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: Mallory Knodel <mallory@article19.org>, pearg@irtf.org
Message-ID: <337912501.12768.1558609139766@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <2c514d92-c426-2869-b589-215a3d84b224@article19.org>
References: <CABtrr-Ubq5z_Nx4-VA7gLgGMaxOBvfpSpXKJfeO9Q9C9eCA8Fg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm22JazQHLN=zZ_RpAwYX5AcUuws6nan-4jShzLwSbz2ysHsQ@mail.gmail.com> <e88b630d-b979-185b-e744-977ab080baad@cs.tcd.ie> <1397790134.3745.1558087203082@appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com> <d1dd5c3a-ba10-406e-d7d7-fc8c07d7ea10@article19.org> <542887485.4822.1558343428572@appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com> <58b015ab-4003-49b5-a46a-2fc0e9633ccf@article19.org> <2076823086.12099.1558598183028@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <2c514d92-c426-2869-b589-215a3d84b224@article19.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.2-Rev4
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Autocrypt: addr=vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFhFR+UBCACfoywFKBRfzasiiR9/6dwY36eLePXcdScumDMR8qoXvRS55QYDjp5bs+yMq41qWV9 xp/cqryY9jnvHbeF3TsE5yEazpD1dleRbkpElUBpPwXqkrSP8uXO9KkS9KoX6gdml6M4L+F82WpqYC1 uTzOE6HPmhmQ4cGSgoia2jolxAhRpzoYN99/BwpvoZeTSLP5K6yPlMPYkMev/uZlAkMMhelli9IN6yA yxcC0AeHSnOAcNKUr13yXyMlTyi1cdMJ4sk88zIbefxwg3PAtYjkz3wgvP96cNVwAgSt4+j/ZuVaENP pgVuM512m051j9SlspWDHtzrci5pBKKFsibnTelrABEBAAG0NUJlcnRvbGEsIFZpdHRvcmlvIDx2aXR 0b3Jpby5iZXJ0b2xhQG9wZW4teGNoYW5nZS5jb20+iQFABBMBAgAqBAsJCAcGFQoJCAsCBRYCAwEAAp 4BAhsDBYkSzAMABQMAAAAABYJYRUflAAoJEIU2cHmzj8qNaG0H/ROY+suCP86hoN+9RIV66Ej8b3sb8 UgwFJOJMupZfeb9yTIJwE4VQT5lTt146CcJJ5jvxD6FZn1Htw9y4/45pPAF7xLE066jg3OqRvzeWRZ3 IDUfJJIiM5YGk1xWxDqppSwhnKcMOuI72iioWxX0nGQrWxpnWJsjt08IEEwuYucDkul1PHsrLJbTd58 fiMKLVwag+IE1SPHOwkPF6arZQZIfB5ThtOZV+36Jn8Hok9XfeXWBVyPkiWCQYVX39QsIbr0JNR9kQy 4g2ZFexOcTe8Jo12jPRL7V8OqStdDes3cje9lWFLnX05nrfLuE0l0JKWEg8akN+McFXc+oV68h7nu5A Q0EWEVH5QEIAIDKanNBe1uRfk8AjLirflZO291VNkOAeUu+dIhecGnZeQW6htlDinlYOnXhtsY1mK9W PUu+xshDq7lXn2G0LxldYwyJYZaJtDgIKqVqwxfA34Lj27oqPuXwcvGhdCgt0SW/YcalRdAi0/AzUCu 5GSaj2kaGUSnBYYUP4szGJXjaK2psP5toQSCtx2pfSXQ6MaqPK9Zzy+D5xc6VWQRp/iRImodAcPf8fg JJvRyJ8Jla3lKWyvBBzJDg6MOf6Fts78bJSt23X0uPp93g7GgbYkuRMnFI4RGoTVkxjD/HBEJ0CNg22 hoHJondhmKnZVrHEluFuSnW0wBEIYomcPSPB+cAEQEAAYkBMQQYAQIAGwUCWEVH5QIbDAQLCQgHBhUK CQgLAgUJEswDAAAKCRCFNnB5s4/KjdO8B/wNpvWtOpLdotR/Xh4fu08Fd63nnNfbIGIETWsVi0Sbr8i E5duuGaaWIcMmUvgKe/BM0Fpj9X01Zjm90uoPrlVVuQWrf+vFlbalUYVZr51gl5UyUFHk+iAZCAA0WB rsmACKvuV1P7GuiX3UV9b59T9taYJxN3dNFuftrEuvsqHimFtlekUjUwoCekTJdncFusBhwz2OrKhHr WWrEsXkfh0+pURWYAlKlTxvXuI7gAfHEQM+6OnrWvXYtlhd0M1sBPnCjbyG63Qws7Rek9bEWKtH6dA6 dmT2FQT+g1S9Mdf0WkPTQNX0x24dm8IoHuD3KYwX7Svx43Xa17aZnXqUjtj1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/o7Emn4lgB5PR_IqxA44zy9PSZOU>
Subject: Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-hall-censorship-tech
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 10:59:04 -0000
> Il 23 maggio 2019 10:51 Mallory Knodel <mallory@article19.org> ha scritto: > > Maybe it's the connotation or interpretation of the word "censorship" > that is getting in the way. It's all censorship, but some of it might be > legitimate (literally in accordance with law and norms). You are right that the definition of "censorship" in section 1 is so broad that any suppression of any content would fall within its scope. However, most people would associate the term "censorship" with the negative use cases(*), or at least with use cases where the suppression is motivated by the opinions and information communicated through the content, rather than by its form or its pertinence to the context. In common talk, I don't think that anyone would consider stuff like (e.g.) removing off-topic posts from a discussion forum, blocking traffic from a virus trying to replicate itself, or preventing access to an online pharmacy that does not have the appropriate licenses, as censorship. Now, if you only want to provide a survey of technologies, it could be enough to state at the beginning that there are also acceptable uses of these technologies but you will only focus on the negative ones. However, I am afraid that, coupled with the broad definition of censorship, this might still give the impression to the reader that this is a list of things that are bad in themselves, and also it will not be very useful research for subsequent application in the IETF space, as the difficult part is what should a protocol designer or implementer do when having to cope with these techniques. Ciao, (*) I am using moral terms such as negative and positive because I guess that in authoritarian countries political censorship is "literally legitimate" :-) though this is also one of the hot policy issues, i.e. whether the IETF should work to disrupt some country's laws when they mandate censorship-the-one-we-all-really-dislike. -- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
- [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-hall-c… Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Shivan Sahib
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Shivan Sahib
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Gurshabad Grover
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [Pearg] descriptive censorship work: draft-ha… Shivan Sahib