Re: [Pearg] Research Group Last Call for "A Survey of Worldwide Censorship Techniques"

Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Thu, 28 May 2020 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947273A0CB8 for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2020 13:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=LhUHkys5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=blM65BfX
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oCllRIJ6xj01 for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2020 13:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350F73A0CB2 for <pearg@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2020 13:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACA25C00CB for <pearg@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2020 16:22:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap4 ([10.202.2.54]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 May 2020 16:22:08 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=nv8BOZkQIARk++z3q/pRrbp4W4XSD/2 PKa+4bzM2mVw=; b=LhUHkys56fDqNK6pDy7gPhMaU7m6zHwzJYJKQwoy/0TeMW+ YsUM3WLzzVAiHti6GczlaM5adxv90w+razPo0WKNPuKfJ5v8Ju3BLAi3GzlqhZG8 1v+je38r6T7CS1M6iXR4t5ESsqh/00qaaXtLEQVMfqLRM/Q0WVGjesgQEgg/PU2U /rmQEUAxMbfki5oPickRM3Zv5pcw/vMBY4YeIlyPCmUNmqkHcybt9mV4jotACROX P0dnfZQLM2AmID/LFr5z+3iv6DxaU8bwSDS044VL5i7Q1PWnnxMOru4n27WXG5J5 tzZQDrMcqXcvUnHDyIw2PGGVMXQxkIvU2I5AcAA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=nv8BOZ kQIARk++z3q/pRrbp4W4XSD/2PKa+4bzM2mVw=; b=blM65BfXTewUyoYEGjlXyg JFobiOEv5wCNMhPzt4zZulR/w/jLi/yXyHKEg1xzWyubor8iX+f2L1f6dlbBf+yi i0IYzCF6o6K/n71Wu047jXdV3IHb8qqf2WtkOupkf/n9iDsUHcGBejKh3dG1UHyL ADCi3IklW3/2XjqdCnioUEuIzNI8y+pGthMNaQhVdsSUTBLh8/Qrb8KXOJYPu355 K5qwZliuSa+qKMMil1QB94JFtQyv8iAmd11oi5TlewI4YOBgieh094sUAUxYFyV4 V+bEg00kmR/w4w2wONxW1pCuBuGf+QzT8TE8FEsjo72DayjQq8uCGaW5TWHexk9w ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:bx3QXsem60uCEv3b5rOwqzKD7wnPLsDfZFpAGVMSwageHXNwC9gt3w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddviedgleduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfvehhrhhishhtohhphhgvrhcuhghoohgufdcuoegtrgif sehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugeffkeekle fgjeetffehieeglefgleduffekudethfehieehjeejueeiieeljeenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegtrgifsehhvggrphhinhhgsg hithhsrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:bx3QXuPolqRLSfivWcbyXdnlbKHFOZ66VB1buecbCKJCz0QtJMx4KQ> <xmx:bx3QXthyISxYVmeHKS-vWHr3SEKPwh3UiWojBsqYCg0ujnIpRJLUwA> <xmx:bx3QXh9ib0vGCblBj5qL8bJ6hz8USXgxRtl7eIKlQinqsh6tAKmdaw> <xmx:cB3QXtOvT6lxGO1evGUX-3z0ZxHc0Hu_skeLtHi2Lw1v3Ix0DKJXtw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id DD0F13C00A1; Thu, 28 May 2020 16:22:07 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-504-g204cd6f-fm-20200527.002-g204cd6f2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0dff13b6-079e-4cbb-bab7-284cd3bc81da@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR06MB6451A72C9AB698391B4A3340B18E0@BY5PR06MB6451.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <08f43a37-2b7b-418e-95a8-ed57484c66be@www.fastmail.com> <F466D238-BCC9-476B-A876-1A72E5B1EEFD@cisco.com> <434A7CA0-DCE1-42A1-89B0-E9B8959B9343@isoc.org> <35B3B2B9-B1E7-41EF-B082-5F5EEF101B0D@cisco.com> <A05941FD-A44A-41DC-90ED-E79E6213700D@isoc.org> <79C21420-970E-46E2-9129-1886597924B1@cisco.com> <eb0f96dc-be68-3473-3a65-39b69e794b5c@cdt.org> <4A68E41D-EF4C-4675-8CFF-ECE0D708661C@cisco.com> <BY5PR06MB645197C9990FB76EA6734BFDB18E0@BY5PR06MB6451.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <B502F2A7-0444-42D5-A33A-48007BDF8453@cisco.com> <BY5PR06MB6451A72C9AB698391B4A3340B18E0@BY5PR06MB6451.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 13:21:19 -0700
From: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: pearg@irtf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/w_98PoD1CpA-uRhVWGZ2cyoVIzw>
Subject: Re: [Pearg] Research Group Last Call for "A Survey of Worldwide Censorship Techniques"
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 20:22:11 -0000

On Thu, May 28, 2020, at 12:32 PM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
>  
> We're not going to describe all the non-technical methods of 
> suppressing flows of data and information. Even a comma-separated list 
> would not be terribly useful. I can find some sort of review article 
> but it's bound to be incomplete or have some other default. We felt the 
> need to point out that there is other nuance and pressure points but as 
> the document says it's primarily focused on technical network 
> censorship.
> 
> If you brought text, we would is course consider it.

To try and sharpen this point a bit: this document will certainly have gaps, and it's not a goal to fill all those gaps. This field moves quickly enough that trying to doing so would likely be futile. The chair decision to begin RGLC was based on the document's content and history, which was deemed sufficiently thorough with respect to relevant issues that protocol designers might consider going forward. That said, concrete suggestions to fill in those gaps are welcome! The authors and RG should certainly review them if provided, though we won't block progress waiting for additional content that doesn't substantially change the document's purpose.

Best,
Chris (chair hat on)