IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pearg] Call for adoption: draft-wood-pearg-website-fingerprinting-00

Amelia Andersdotter <amelia.ietf@andersdotter.cc> Sat, 15 February 2020 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <amelia.ietf@andersdotter.cc>
X-Original-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pearg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F344D120071 for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 04:09:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dgFbQGxG0glz for <pearg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 04:09:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net (relay10.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A647120048 for <pearg@irtf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 04:08:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.60.54.202] (unknown [93.122.166.150]) (Authenticated sender: amelia@andersdotter.cc) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD5DE240003 for <pearg@irtf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:08:52 +0000 (UTC)
To: pearg@irtf.org
References: <B33EF781-F4E7-4B09-B0AC-3B39DE181F73@sinodun.com> <8db26e2a-de9f-08bf-e822-ea3093dda7cc@andersdotter.cc> <b4c1f751-2e2a-4afb-8441-1befd022f5cd@www.fastmail.com>
Reply-To: amelia.ietf@andersdotter.cc
From: Amelia Andersdotter <amelia.ietf@andersdotter.cc>
Message-ID: <543d9512-b6ae-fe9b-3354-00cf65c43605@andersdotter.cc>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:08:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b4c1f751-2e2a-4afb-8441-1befd022f5cd@www.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US-large
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/wdP55pZjoY5t9beW_de6zkp1_Jo>
Subject: Re: [Pearg] Call for adoption: draft-wood-pearg-website-fingerprinting-00
X-BeenThere: pearg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhancements and Assessment Proposed RG <pearg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pearg/>
List-Post: <mailto:pearg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg>, <mailto:pearg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:09:35 -0000

On 2020-01-21 17:32, Christopher Wood wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020, at 2:38 AM, Amelia Andersdotter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I support adoption. Bearing mind Stephen's comments from earlier, there
>> may some work already ongoing in IPSecME:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs/
> Thanks for raising this, Amelia! I filed an issue to cite it accordingly:
>
>    https://github.com/chris-wood/ietf-fingerprinting/issues/4

Meanwhile at IEEE: P802.1AEdk MAC Privacy protection - PAR Approved by
the SASB

It's following the IPTFS stuff (like they're aiming for the same
category of increased privacy protection).

Thought it'd be interesting!

/a


> Best,
> Chris
>
>> Abstract:
>>
>> "This document describes a mechanism to enhance IPsec traffic flow
>> security by adding traffic flow confidentiality to encrypted IP
>> encapsulated traffic.  Traffic flow confidentiality is provided by
>> obscuring the size and frequency of IP traffic using a fixed-sized,
>> constant-send-rate IPsec tunnel.  The solution allows for congestion
>> control as well."
>>
>> There's also a project in IEEE 802.1 (well, it's starting up at this
>> time) that tries to explore ways of mitigating web traffic
>> fingerprinting by ensuring packet length/timing etc. are homogeneous. It
>> will be covered eventually here: https://1.ieee802.org/security/
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> Amelia
>>
>> On 2020-01-13 10:42, Sara Dickinson wrote:
>>> Hi All, 
>>>
>>> A draft called ‘Network-Based Website Fingerprinting' (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wood-pearg-website-fingerprinting/) has been presented twice in PEARG meetings and received positive feedback at IETF 106. This email starts a two week Call for Adoption of this document.
>>>
>>> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by PEARG and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>>>
>>> This call for adoption ends on 27th January 2020.
>>>
>>> Sara. 
>>
>> -- 
>> Pearg mailing list
>> Pearg@irtf.org
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/pearg
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email