PEM, X.500 - discussion
Tim Dean <dean@hydra.dra.hmg.gb> Tue, 21 January 1997 15:29 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa19439; 21 Jan 97 10:29 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11858; 21 Jan 97 10:29 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id KAA01034 for pem-dev-outgoing; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:16:56 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199701211523.KAA25928@relay.hq.tis.com>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <DEAN@hydra.dra.hmg.gb>
From: Tim Dean <dean@hydra.dra.hmg.gb>
To: pgp-mime@purpletape.cs.uchicago.edu, smime-dev@rsa.com, pem-dev@tis.com
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 10:17:05 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: PEM, X.500 - discussion
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.42a)
Sender: owner-pem-dev@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Somewhere in the recesses of my memory I seem to recall reading a paper which reported on a meeting discussing amongst other things the reasons why Privacy Enhanced Mail has not been widely taken up on the Internet. I seem to recall it also talked about X.500, as well as other security issues. I thought it was an RFC but can't seem to find it now. Can anyone point me to a document which fits this description? Any help gratefully received! Tim Dean ----------------------------------------------- Tim Dean Defence Research Agency Malvern United Kingdom +44-1684-894239 ----------------------------------------------------
- PEM, X.500 - discussion Tim Dean
- Re: PEM, X.500 - discussion Blake Ramsdell