Re: [PEPPERMINT] DRINKS PROPOSED Charter ..comments please.

I think that is a perfectly reasonable idea, but the task at hand is to get
a charter approved.

I don't think there would be a problem with a place holder.

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: peppermint-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:peppermint-bounces@ietf.org]
>  On Behalf Of Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk
>  Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 7:28 AM
>  To: peppermint@ietf.org
>  Subject: Re: [PEPPERMINT] DRINKS PROPOSED Charter ..comments please.
>  
>  > >  DY> Do you see the data to be exchanged to also include
>  information
>  > >  using in billing?
>  >
>  > IMHO no .. that would be a charter stretch I personally believe the
>  > AD's/IESG would not accept, at this time. Remember this is a new WG.
>  The
>  > first order of business is to produce results based on a limited set
>  of
>  > initial tasks. On the basis of initial WG success it is always
>  possible
>  to
>  > build on success to take on other tasks the WG deems useful.
>  
>  Richard,
>  
>  Could we consider at least allowing for some sort of opaque identifier
>  to
>  represent billing information, with the mapping between that
>  identifier
>  and "real" billing information "to be defined later, possibly
>  elsewhere" ?
>  
>  kind regards,
>  
>  Ray
>  
>  --
>  Ray Bellis, MA(Oxon)
>  Senior Researcher in Advanced Projects, Nominet
>  e: ray@nominet.org.uk, t: +44 1865 332211
>  _______________________________________________
>  PEPPERMINT mailing list
>  PEPPERMINT@ietf.org
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint

_______________________________________________
PEPPERMINT mailing list
PEPPERMINT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint