[PEPPERMINT] Data model for "reachability data" and naming/terminology for group of addresses

   In draft-mule-peppermint-espp-protocol-01.txt, a data model is
proposed Figure 3.  Otmar and a number of folks have commented on the
list that the 'bottom' part of data model (the grouping of user
addresses, PSTN prefixes, or anything that be logically attached to a
SIP route/domain) seems to make some sense for some use cases.  The
upper part is where folks see different solutions.

We're updating the draft to integrate comments received from the list
and fix a few issues we found.
1) We're changing LRNs (US, PSTN centric to Penn and Otmar's point) to
use prefix.
David et al. have chosen prefix in their problem statement draft and
this describes something that's close to LRNs, yet more generally
applicable.
2) We're also renaming "Service Areas" to "AddressGroup" for a lack of a
better term

Comments welcome.  You should also see some responses in the coming
weeks on the other threads re: espp comments.

Jean-Francois.

_______________________________________________
PEPPERMINT mailing list
PEPPERMINT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint