[Perc] Confirmation of Consensus on PERC Double from IETF 99

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Thu, 27 July 2017 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F1213201F for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id whGleQ1L9ppM for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC41E131CEE for <perc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id v29so46079287qtv.3 for <perc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yUaBsnPAlkUfsyb0x4048iI2SKbt3uFIdmexVvblgOQ=; b=ciy8PQMhAu+2/Q7+QMUozj7E9Id2RWCrW8PfLA9Rx7Wj+e1Z5foJpax8mQbhzTHJoJ FaXOgvPh4Xh2nKE/I7j9v9lbDOq0u4mZce0CzMOTE+fgFOYr/fgbXc/uQRdOySGvY45X oNsQjSuZTSFIh5cKFiwsvdJthn+SMUpmkiS7MOGflfyP3m4yLGcLF9DbC9mVvjjbwCtN QeS6VTwscPdEvC3pNaKYJIl3d28bm/1ulu7sj4BE7CBooWk4VxfkH+5QjQlUHPXdwRLp EWtibg4B5Ojq2GjbHuG3yu4sGXxGCjNCWsv1VsP64YY0/BAaXcckGOON5e7llsKyZEm3 ESuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yUaBsnPAlkUfsyb0x4048iI2SKbt3uFIdmexVvblgOQ=; b=NwsjhZPD5orK+TbDhoexYsfAqFAZl+wcU1/puKVgCYL/7ZkZePp6siCi9HpUYKxeYH c3o9ovN05jpvUyJCZk0LCmzekXOp282Fsk9Wo14qxHjDrasvkw8xFyxHulB8jEK4fbYB MDjtPnWJTE0Ow9Gd+3nZFAs5a0R5E8BL5Vm9ScRmz5+9Wgtgj2zMM+8rGOC1DfgcTF4t WczcHVkcJWSMikEhp/Ca5QBJUoCTzYd+z8w4Wfy+Sgu31v0dKt8BC8mx3oRjGD3COFke U6yIKmsdYogFjDQNKdTH99LuRIrd2kbIAZP3lfm2PSBwvvqroATDEWz8D+DJkLwWsYHa PH5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111PDeI+Kd21k7oZD9+XNDB2D7ox2Ep5k4LqmlJpHVVKGFiJZFcO 2v20tuozFXeIJ8YRf9tvmx+xij3zh8XQ
X-Received: by 10.200.3.135 with SMTP id t7mr6659567qtg.216.1501175659643; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.130.196 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:14:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGRW4JkyTSfUeDVWrXGAt0_x-yWhAzdKXDjkUJ0XH-P7cA@mail.gmail.com>
To: perc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4030435c300f0481905554fb1c8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/3fPqYTE2qhT351nvp1b7wkf4-bc>
Subject: [Perc] Confirmation of Consensus on PERC Double from IETF 99
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:14:23 -0000

Hi All,

At the IETF 99 meeting, we took hum on the following proposals and there
was a strong consensus in the room in their favor, but we wish to gather
any additional inputs on the list.
So, if there are any additional inputs that was not expressed in the room,
please send them to the list by *4th August.*

First Consensus Call:
   Allow MD to modify the 'M' (marker) bit.

Second Consensus called made includes all the following 3 proposals as a
singleton:
    - Move the OHB information from header extension to payload
    - RTX, RED and FlexFEC ordering : use the ordering of applying repair
on the double-encrypted packet. (Option 'A' in the slides)
    - DTMF : PERC will only support E2E DTMF and MD will not be able to
read DTMF info sent as media

Here are the notes from the meeting:
  https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/minutes/minutes-99-perc-01.txt

Here are the slides corresponding to the above proposals :
  https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-perc-double-01.pdf


Thanks
Perc Chairs