[Perc] RTX/FEC E2E feasibility
Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 17:05 UTC
Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2824F129BA0 for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7XP_hnT7XtL5 for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com (mail-wr0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C5471200CF for <perc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id j27so5013034wre.1 for <perc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KCVhLQzXp8GNkGYZl/H0hg6phwkPcHn7reSCXwDg9BA=; b=SVnV0hidmnoPAQKVLl94XL/A+OyJzI8iqriQcyFCu/mC6KV6KRLIOxfXcxbCkswI+X 6qgQfB7LibZwNTlu342Z6hNLkCKeptAplwyjO7OUcoE3AUR7OAw1i/3R0C2Aw6V6bUCI Z8M4UW2tYlOXcGhSCZj0QUzsu2IhLPCYsuHmm5aOPFtLxDOZ9g28vmcuvg8xJVTDwDM0 NOTglU6qR0LmZzvEusNJZ/daxNm2T0oqRuMpsO36I3+8SkZpx0bBsDOVey7QF4yTzScA SNgJVk2ZWhtybV2/LZhS0yx560PKZIcxHN9HN9gCiKWCfk9TY9KygMZDBwo8843VnfoT UlJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KCVhLQzXp8GNkGYZl/H0hg6phwkPcHn7reSCXwDg9BA=; b=Fa0RhRThEj/bNOx9JIyXbszSjq36TdKnXFnRb+RX/1l8okK5FCAnW8SAUffcb1wTg/ R+3CXbiLDqKrlxGuyVIxhCXjvOdldiS+WouE/n05S/XaKt62aPLu7FIdtNmEDHvj7IKn mcRfmiQmsImD6kWWmbJ3JA+5AA2ygun1vTWlwRfz+FrAodS3SwOAD0kkZJUCzjRxn1bo V6OnvBfLr6fz74ItgoWQ1k0JhfI9zWJYpqYoAn/MdBdV1xEiEfZYqPh8opn6w7kPlwKo CE9047yobgQ/VzY55NXJGMwojPUd2fPPD5NsVw5J08iExOje7Lw23dI2fI1Cl/DNORPX c+dQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDAC3EnDGjwEfBb4xlchaFGST03CxFt8VzHAgG776tPSNzBcqpq 00NgeXRPxv0fOb99O9w=
X-Received: by 10.223.130.117 with SMTP id 108mr13452200wrb.70.1495645497692; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.43] (84.red-83-36-143.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.36.143.84]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v27sm5462948wra.19.2017.05.24.10.04.56 for <perc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 May 2017 10:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: "perc@ietf.org" <perc@ietf.org>
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3c3b4471-ca93-8f26-09e3-fbe10d5e2a6f@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 19:04:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/JqWdJDT16FeKBzinyeU0rK8lnFU>
Subject: [Perc] RTX/FEC E2E feasibility
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:05:01 -0000
Hi all, As per my AP during the meeting, I would like to bring the topic about the feasibility of end 2 end RTX/FEC. Same as for the media rtp stream, the MD will most probably have to rewrite PT, SSRC and seq numbers for the RTX/FEC stream, and given the rtx/fec packets will have to protect/recover the "media OHB", the rtx/fec packet will need to contain two different OHB headers, one for the media and one for the rtx/fec packet itself. At least that is not feasible with current RTX (as the rtx packet extensions and the media extensions are the same), and not even sure how this will interact with E2E header extensions. Best regards Sergio
- [Perc] RTX/FEC E2E feasibility Sergio Garcia Murillo