Re: [Perc] DTMF in Double
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 15 August 2017 17:32 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4135C132143 for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3nwFLBYbWfkt for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F3A120713 for <perc@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.roach.at (cpe-70-122-154-80.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.154.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v7FHW736042388 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:32:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-154-80.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.154.80] claimed to be Svantevit.roach.at
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com>
Cc: "perc@ietf.org" <perc@ietf.org>
References: <65EF378D-664F-46E3-8853-56E5BB52C83D@iii.ca> <c5b1ec7b-67d9-c4bb-d5dd-92aac96f189d@nostrum.com> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD7FD189@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> <C3AA87FE-CC50-422D-89F7-0ABF92C50D72@iii.ca>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <302b3958-f7d3-437e-9da3-cc452a9de2db@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:32:06 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C3AA87FE-CC50-422D-89F7-0ABF92C50D72@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/KpA76eAZ0Gp9hLe_Gy1-RJbODqs>
Subject: Re: [Perc] DTMF in Double
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:32:17 -0000
On 8/15/17 12:21 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote: > > I have no strong opinion if we should add this to the draft or not. > When I read it written up, It seems way outside the scope of double > and more like something that would be at a system level. But the PR if > we want to adopt it is at > > https://github.com/ietf/perc-wg/pull/130 > LGTM. /a
- [Perc] DTMF in Double Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Perc] DTMF in Double Adam Roach
- Re: [Perc] DTMF in Double Roni Even
- Re: [Perc] DTMF in Double Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Perc] DTMF in Double Adam Roach
- Re: [Perc] DTMF in Double Roni Even