[Perc] PERC LIte

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4404A12EB60 for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tiaNwpY5qDW5 for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F1712EB79 for <perc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d127so74686633wmf.0 for <perc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version; bh=HAMWmX4dcByWbhINPXmlTFv1/WP1IMORdrGU7ZTeVFQ=; b=vYL23dtRnLx5xFV0DYcwl7b5p7QAxlirHPVxmrrCt8SdxuMgiEozQWFu7AGf5y3qKC PW/yOdLzMaLc+NbFHDc//0LYi39Qpvm7PiPjEIPb302RC61RlENQtuGX1iRL/gwGHwyO /RZPt3pDzRx6NqTFDrHXgqLq3OXIVVRXkYvWmNhQFbE1xrjN089Bgg3fFacz3eJeuZfp OI2418vu2+SWZ+aaY62BTN7/9Z/rg3+xFulO7X7ljKsefGDliXD1Oj3IjgWTzQoJnEtB i448D7l4k1ZNcdQusVVSakTglfxnQ8ZmgR1XFI6XxifLl6vtAj5O33bRuoKzkrgBgm8K K3fQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version; bh=HAMWmX4dcByWbhINPXmlTFv1/WP1IMORdrGU7ZTeVFQ=; b=peoW1UHb3vD1uGLiDpLWwRWxoPrdF7rLLrzeUXYC+NrysD5+FMef9Iey26qX67SWhX XFOIhbKJIEXiwZ1c6hleQvz92Sfpt5iIVujD//7MeArAdXbGKd3WkOZ5b2E2c1Vt3Nqu M0cK8kONFljMLks7cAgalUnJSDtp7LF3I9HPIcB5GcNl2Rqn+MhOOCVIsSfTuX2S0WaS i8CG3jOQps5ua8Lf2gq370WoBZIkVlSVEGHK8N3IlIUh2cZNk+wnNWlgGSbzjBGHCqs9 UDXjs3s7uXkxwGBuRRMIjVtnMVMpYw/lXAmibvL3uiG5LAycYWX/Vflno/2x855Ctubj VCXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBlgiMXIT7UTLXlrAuFPN5FUEqnW5idU+JP480g2G3RssbCo4Gz OfT9alN3ctVuhe7Cs8E=
X-Received: by 10.28.43.130 with SMTP id r124mr6710417wmr.83.1495645911926; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.43] (84.red-83-36-143.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.36.143.84]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm7067608wry.31.2017.05.24.10.11.50 for <perc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 May 2017 10:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
To: "perc@ietf.org" <perc@ietf.org>
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9d1552b8-b69f-ac14-e28b-2905bd5e5692@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 19:11:50 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------44C8291FC2129350777CCB04"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/SB0qMHWz6EsDtz3yIEX0HWp5IEY>
Subject: [Perc] PERC LIte
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:11:56 -0000

Hi all again,

Also to start the discussion about 5), I would like to introduce again 
my proposal for a "PERC Lite" approach.

The main objectives and key points of this proposal are:

  * Minimum viable PERC implementation
  * Minimize impact on both endpoints and MD
  * OHB is carried in the RTP payload (Encrypted Payload Header).
  * No changes to the DTLS/SRTP code/api/standards
  * No RTP E2E Header extensions
  * RTX/FEC/RED is supported HBH without any change to current
    standards/implementations.

Best regards

Sergio