IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Perc] PERC LIte

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Thu, 25 May 2017 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B900129B3C for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 09:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5sLgveEhFxI0 for <perc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 09:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A0C7129B3A for <perc@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 09:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id b84so99362871wmh.0 for <perc@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 09:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=X8Yy5At94w9JJUWoyQzm/mqrN1F1DgeXK3jH9HfNcCw=; b=XgaUoE7fa8y8awLycsPRugHMDgc5Q9IIWL1DcG5W4yzuPPagcezBStJJb2t1e+CHiK A+jI4LFzfjO9QqCOO7muQPCwSmonOsr6EJs4dA2qsnQI3ubl2dOwWulU8V0QXTCVoFDr wnbJfeMJpVXE7TrzOI0MW5FqQQGxH17DuoSxfI2okirJrXjWa0DLS7SSZNmQJ3B0Jq/X Z4kbRumAcyW/ccmEWMWanvr9VnA42R1TtAE2RbsHUYWEwnahygfsvsTkZVXdTdz1yJr4 kvJhKDsF6r13mCXcr+cqzTFu6lY9VrzD9jT7/cPivoZQr8A8XykM3mR8nkmmsxredvFW 6PrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X8Yy5At94w9JJUWoyQzm/mqrN1F1DgeXK3jH9HfNcCw=; b=lbIEhHmLs0j6Tq0/QE27TYwlOD8MyaPYe8+IohIqmedAVAgHlRjbEaF9fJ5I6MWDyb 4/+VxSvVId+pe6hTAzR8wz0j60ikqvc2GivooKb7usvx3LaqI0dgOJSI+ommZBnlwl6c HP+LEsBTd0wczdLKtQlG76Cnn31vc7OT5PB54/1pyIxPm6sRvZ/mRw4NrzYCMFl0ZXT4 J9/J6LbbQ5u/oX1kKTEkTVbymU7ib7h/5K+uilCvEPKUqxCSK4hS9fkdOlr2OOJQft6C NHaUNvxZZPzVOJNDEnikSzwtBQXZPoR/grmq9pgYLmK6WvvOlFnKBqyKc4u1G+RndLSV Z/uQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcD2TphZ3newh3mfaGvFkcr6rHZCfreocIb/lxJuFrb64oM6C/yM R+C/13JfG1tJynfS0+EhAhZ+Waop7WF8PrE=
X-Received: by 10.28.157.74 with SMTP id g71mr10088152wme.74.1495730212071; Thu, 25 May 2017 09:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.109.82 with HTTP; Thu, 25 May 2017 09:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9d1552b8-b69f-ac14-e28b-2905bd5e5692@gmail.com>
References: <9d1552b8-b69f-ac14-e28b-2905bd5e5692@gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 12:36:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgS9YRuiDv37xwwS1qggvZOo=ZDB4v7sSueac3pgK9bE7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Cc: "perc@ietf.org" <perc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114baa5ef881a705505bd30f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/T0FCM0aadCssbdFlb3I8GlS9nZA>
Subject: Re: [Perc] PERC LIte
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 16:36:55 -0000

Hey Sergio,

Emil said on the call yesterday that this has been implemented in Chrome.
Is your patch some place public?  It might help folks understand your
proposal here if they could see the code.

Thanks,
--Richard

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Sergio Garcia Murillo <
sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all again,
>
> Also to start the discussion about 5), I would like to introduce again my
> proposal for a "PERC Lite" approach.
>
> The main objectives and key points of this proposal are:
>
>    - Minimum viable PERC implementation
>    - Minimize impact on both endpoints and MD
>    - OHB is carried in the RTP payload (Encrypted Payload Header).
>    - No changes to the DTLS/SRTP code/api/standards
>    - No RTP E2E Header extensions
>    - RTX/FEC/RED is supported HBH without any change to current
>    standards/implementations.
>
> Best regards
>
> Sergio
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Perc mailing list
> Perc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email