Re: [Perc] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-10: (with COMMENT)
"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Tue, 14 May 2019 01:19 UTC
Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF441200FF; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=packetizer.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tsvfPRWQ6k6N; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [IPv6:2600:1f18:24d6:2e01:e842:9b2b:72a2:d2c6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA5C912008C; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authuser (localhost [127.0.0.1])
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1557796749; bh=jXaLOcEv/LQq0wY26UfGhhbWCT8bIPwC82J0f77Ew8g=; h=From:To:Subject:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To; b=gcSLWdq/0CK7ORQbOF9X3iIL7WOKqQ+lerPPrivg5nSEXOEfzLMXVWJjVwBhHFa0b bURr/yyB7P95X0gTGHCJ259c2GVhKdznqq6mg0RcfSIjPVWcKuUUwL+GDV1mZQIT+J w63Gnqnnlv1xqaDILiqMXhyLxsFP0iuZDUJBSATA=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework@ietf.org, Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>, perc-chairs@ietf.org, nohlmeier@mozilla.com, perc@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 01:19:03 +0000
Message-Id: <em099e7bfe-78c8-4e78-a05a-95d21a0fe979@sydney>
In-Reply-To: <155778680114.23612.8118531689244716936.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <155778680114.23612.8118531689244716936.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
User-Agent: eM_Client/7.2.34711.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/WDZ_nz7JUPvkAxcqfZPF9xPnHxs>
Subject: Re: [Perc] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 01:19:17 -0000
Thanks, Adam. All good comments that I've made locally. The changes will appear in the next revision. Note that section 6.5 also has keys in a different order. Since that deals with multiple HBH keys, I'm not sure that it makes sense to re-order the table, since I can't get a 1:1 mapping. However, I'm happy to move anything around if you thinks it lends to readability. Paul ------ Original Message ------ From: "Adam Roach via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework@ietf.org; "Nils Ohlmeier" <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>; perc-chairs@ietf.org; nohlmeier@mozilla.com; perc@ietf.org Sent: 5/13/2019 6:33:21 PM Subject: Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-10: (with COMMENT) >Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for >draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-10: Yes > >When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >introductory paragraph, however.) > > >Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > >The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework/ > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >COMMENT: >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >I'm glad to see this work finally ready for publication. As I've already >given several rounds of input on this document, I have only minor >editorial comments. >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >§2: > >> This may >> include embedded user conferencing equipment or browsers on >> computers, media gateways, MCUs, media recording device and more that >> are in the trusted domain for a given deployment. > >Nit: "...media recording devices, and more..." > pluralize _/ \_ add comma > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >§2: > >> In the context of >> WebRTC... > >Please add an informative citation to https://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/ > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >§2: > >> It operates according to the Selective >> Forwarding Middlebox RTP topologies [RFC7667] per the constraints >> defined by the PERC system, which includes, but not limited to, > >Nit: "...but is not limited to..." > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >§6.1: > >Nit: The keys are described in the sections that follow in the order >they are typically acquired, but listed in a different order in Figure 4. >This confused me for several moments. Consider reordering Figure 4 to match >the order in which the keys are described. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >
- [Perc] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-perc-privat… Adam Roach via Datatracker
- Re: [Perc] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-perc-pr… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Perc] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-perc-pr… Adam Roach