[Perc] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet-11: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 04 February 2020 22:39 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet@ietf.org, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>, perc-chairs@ietf.org, suhasietf@gmail.com, perc@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <158085597556.15832.2393413092926333829.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 14:39:35 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/w21RFeiGA0kweWbeP7Wh8BTXgTM>
Subject: [Perc] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet-11: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-perc-srtp-ekt-diet/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The document appears to have already gotten significant review with iterative updates.

Section 5.2.
   If an EKTKey message is received that cannot be processed, then the
   recipient MUST respond with an appropriate DTLS alert.

Is there any more specificity that can be provided on which DTLS alert might be appropriate?

[Perc] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker