Re: [perpass] perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net> Wed, 04 December 2013 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jacob@appelbaum.net>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAB71AE1AA for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:39:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.517
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=2, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CJgAuB05C0Nj for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0319D1AE178 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:39:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hq4so8605329wib.5 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:39:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h60yODUWoHBoPqiY4QKpMesSQhHBGCoGe3t1tdLpbj8=; b=Kj85bvfdMZWGJPEfy8esJvDuGADl1E+VduPBogHStNihXczGD+AU3TpzyZkUFq0pWp bXKXN4+KqNJ0L940hJvTDnr6NCziAQtiwkbWVlNwN7y1lxUphvlZCxpi6M/Dp9zSAaCJ rTGoH1PZffOPbqOctSOW6TPjfs8jTc/BIFfo2RcH92JlVsuWBZ3KXct/2Ip8ndM5ACGf 2aOgTsz9BNRBRwFQWBMyq1WHsOeprkxDUTY+eO5UZegt3IMwqGgr882Nrzr1rxfZw5o8 LH87IOsGhLoMTamAT6tDsNRlhOHgTrUC4BjgtOJCk7nd9MPpttO68Qx47uDtxzeemFXv aQEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUQQMm/mllhH6gDGtYeypFEpww5FR1EsVfiuzg4xWzO95HdQMgBZqqYbIEwrtSNzDRyePp
X-Received: by 10.194.110.138 with SMTP id ia10mr66100415wjb.3.1386189555311; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:39:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([185.25.253.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w20sm10259702wia.5.2013.12.04.12.39.12 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:39:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <529F90AC.9000102@appelbaum.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 20:29:32 +0000
From: Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
References: <E2DA1477-C86E-441E-A33D-D47A0D67AFF3@iab.org> <EF9BD1E4-6EF3-4035-AC4E-1A2D3CADE615@mnot.net> <529E8494.7000806@perens.com> <20131204111309.GB11727@nic.fr> <529F8D1F.8090402@perens.com>
In-Reply-To: <529F8D1F.8090402@perens.com>
OpenPGP: id=4193A197
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: perpass@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [perpass] perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 20:39:20 -0000

Bruce Perens:
> On 12/04/2013 03:13 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> Excuse me, but it seems you did not participate in the many
>> discussions about privacy in the last ten years. It is now well-known
>> that any information can be processed and used to find out about
>> users. Monitoring access to these files is one of the simplest means
>> to deduce (from the pattern of access) what an user is doing. There
>> are therefore many reasons to obscure it.
> In my early teens I figured out how to tap telephones and actually tapped a 
> neighbor and my friend's cop neighbor. The conclusion of my experimentation was 
> that other people's phone calls are dreadfully boring.

Imagine if this was admissible in court and that someone else was
telling this story about you? How would that have impacted your life?
How could it impact your life in the future?

> 
> I don't particularly care if someone can reconstruct a pattern of access from 
> public file retrievals I make on the web. I can't imagine why anyone would ever 
> be interested.
> 

That seems like quite a privilege, doesn't it? Not everyone is so lucky
as you - will you stand by their side or dismiss them simply because it
doesn't apply to you, in your view?

> I have NDAs with various companies and confidentiality orders from a few courts, 
> and I'm an insider stockholder for two companies. I'm careful with that data. 
> But casual stuff on the web? Nothing to hide there.

Do you use the same computer for browsing the web as you do for your
email? If so, I guess anyone who does would have some negligence to
hide, no?

Sincerely,
Jacob