Re: [perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net> Wed, 04 December 2013 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jacob@appelbaum.net>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAAA1AE177 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:56:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pn1-s7HYfhBP for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:56:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932131ADF28 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:56:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t10so2832418eei.0 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:56:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g2bErCWG3+XaRMNSnWkCq8Jf1TTSjFonv9qcVC44tA8=; b=SwmdIb7ff/ehwYnb7jPi/7gQ+9wYA773kIpLvRikTVCwMYHxZ1XKE/oHTZuuOAg1ob ATFbmsXrA8V8hvHl32dYRMyGEVaESpCb+9bxXmzPI81WpHlBIqL8nTgZAXHK1TJt+SOM 9MKXD1YPhF/FAMYt6N9qE/EwH0Y5tDMiDRiI7GXaUUU4+LQrTX16ZhuB/zamVQ19e0mp cx/YQ6HVEcrm7u4RO7WggbzERga+WiFf+45j5Dh6/ZEj46EDvxxQZVSfVDH4I3Y3EF1n cGN4ZlPAZOv6zOA0cID25vbOIpauMmmm0BZLfC29IPel87Xx/W3YM4rH56d1VYmHtXLm n2fg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmr3OTj7tKzF708vWc8vCz8XzDxqJLOUpkH9aHBRNt58pBxk+Mi8Sk4VccUAm3S+zTfX1fX
X-Received: by 10.14.219.4 with SMTP id l4mr9521946eep.94.1386201395968; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:56:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (spftor4e1.privacyfoundation.ch. [77.109.138.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e43sm88724144eep.7.2013.12.04.15.56.33 for <perpass@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:56:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <529FC047.5000109@appelbaum.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 23:52:39 +0000
From: Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: perpass@ietf.org
References: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E5103799@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <2C66A416-5F07-4803-A4C0-BB61734BA42E@nominum.com> <529FB216.7010504@perens.com> <CAMm+Lwjyp2eiVyqujnxiad9+iqUjkbJDhshB3+g-8fWkwgc5Vg@mail.gmail.com> <529FBC5F.7050700@perens.com>
In-Reply-To: <529FBC5F.7050700@perens.com>
OpenPGP: id=4193A197
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 23:56:40 -0000

Bruce Perens:
> On 12/04/2013 02:57 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>>
>> When someone starts accusing everyone of treason it isn't so much refutation 
>> that is appropriate as the men in white coats.
> Oh, come on Phillip. I did not accuse anyone, I said that it was arguably 
> criminal or treasonous, and warned of the danger to you.

It was very clearly implied and your general tone is so shitty, I had to
read some headers to ensure you weren't being impersonated.

I work on cryptographic software that does exactly what you suggest and
we've been at it for ten years; your legal advice seems totally off base
and frankly, unhelpful to those working on both political and technical
solutions. Talk about FUD!

> 
> I work for law firms all day, bridging technology and law. I think
> 

Have you asked anyone at the EFF what they think of your legal opinions?
I think they'd get a good laugh out of it and then they'd probably give
you some reading material.

Sincerely,
Jacob