Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff

In the IAB privacy program we did a little bit of this, not focused on PM,
but on a variety of privacy aspects:
<http://www.iab.org/activities/programs/privacy-program/privacy-reviews/>.
Just wanted to bring those reviews to people's attention in case they are
helpful.

I would also suggest that the guidelines/checklist in
http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc6973#section-7 might be of some help,
particularly if these reviews want to go beyond analysis of a single privacy
aspect (say, confidentiality). The guidelines did not contemplate PM, but
probably could be adapted to do so.

Alissa

On 1/29/14 6:16 AM, "Scott Brim" <scott.brim@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> First, what are the goals of getting organized? ☺  Some of us already consider
> privacy as a matter of course for new drafts (I do gen-art reviews in addition
> to WG reviews). I don't think we want to organize a group to comment on new
> material - it would be better get privacy/pm to be included in security
> considerations. My goal for a group would be to organize reviews of *existing*
> drafts/RFCs that are in common use. It shouldn't take a lot of work, maybe
> just a wiki page.
> 
> I'm enthusiastic about having a side meeting in London.
> 
> Scott
> _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list
> perpass@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass