IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] Tiny stacks

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Tue, 10 December 2013 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3BE1AE052 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:50:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lyUyZDGsVUPe for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:50:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-x234.google.com (mail-oa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CCC1AE02A for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:50:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id h16so5945980oag.25 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:50:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=QOsecu2scUuksxLp0TWPB3w5LKx2JWMKsXhjzvjW48s=; b=sp0MFIRQQqWdriocBaOIHLZjn0qYbXVpX31X5ZfCJCmhm3Rgq7M/XzE3M/FxwD5QJZ 3Jm3sk/heBTHT3Q7xtsxuKHvNmaERr5u1UyYxGuGBD+Se3WHnYVINARp/7tBZh4f4gHc vzXi6jQGqM0bgpooWLBYB3gtTToGBP28k3+uB747ZcTpzxyH9ZlwVhm+0X05D6a9SXUh 5epVzJ3GIxLaeWeXpHRm9TUoTOeofIdqjJ9VLUA0OyHUc0jAq6f6PcTq7QFAbceP8/u6 BNM8ut/GYIXhmquoixRlSs0uqt5lTHaxKEzFrR2PMjR5jd8ltYAOuVJ1m7D9aNJ85PSl P7wg==
X-Received: by 10.60.115.138 with SMTP id jo10mr1389871oeb.71.1386701443621; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:50:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.48.9 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:50:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CED082ED-A919-4031-B069-7D0EFCC89205@isoc.org>
References: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E5103799@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <2C66A416-5F07-4803-A4C0-BB61734BA42E@nominum.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E510379A@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <529F7690.2050302@gmx.net> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E510379C@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <52A1BBBC.9090509@cs.tcd.ie> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E510379D@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <52A4D7D9.9000603@cs.tcd.ie> <52A4E412.4030804@gmail.com> <72B86100-E73E-46BD-ABD6-8E35D56DBDDA@cisco.com> <52A61E4C.6020403@gmail.com> <CAL02cgR4T=HdKq64Fq6pJWezp=_20iL8jB+knJoid=LUjDKpWg@mail.gmail.com> <CED082ED-A919-4031-B069-7D0EFCC89205@isoc.org>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:50:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP9gu7BvxNQGp1HxhP5ZZ_ru4XdU12zQA9UbRZw=Svyn_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, perpass <perpass@ietf.org>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [perpass] Tiny stacks
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:50:50 -0000

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org> wrote:
> And in some cases, a tiny stack is an advantage. It shortens the path whose
> trustworthiness one has to assure.

... except that to keep unit costs down, usually they pick up code
from a low bidder.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email