IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 21 August 2013 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53DF11E80FA for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QCCCD2Ve1aG1 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E3011E8262 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B16DBE77; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:25:52 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXkboFOpTbHV; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:25:48 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.7] (unknown [86.42.16.220]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFEEFBE61; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:25:48 +0100 (IST)
References: <5214E525.7020702@cs.tcd.ie> <5214F25D.6070707@bbn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <5214F25D.6070707@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <367DA241-3B40-4731-9FA0-1CE7C5BBC901@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329)
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:25:47 +0100
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Cc: "perpass@ietf.org" <perpass@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [perpass] relevant LISP discussion
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for discussion of the privacy properties of IETF protocols and concrete ways in which those could be improved. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:26:05 -0000

On 21 Aug 2013, at 18:01, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> wrote:

> I might be more impressed if the sender of the message understood that one does not use
> EC(DH) to encrypt/decrypt anything!

Well, help with fixing stuff like that's the kind of help we can get for people. More interesting (for me) would be if lisp could be a useful basis for hiding some higher layer information. I'm not sure if it works or not but sounds worth a look. (And btns might also be worth another look too of course)

S


>> Hi,
>> 
>> FYI, there's a thread on the LISP wg list [1] that also seems
>> relevant here.
>> 
>> S.
>> 
>> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg04659.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> perpass mailing list
>> perpass@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
> 
> _______________________________________________
> perpass mailing list
> perpass@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email