Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff

Hi,

I am willing to be self-organized into a PM worrier's klatch.
and even to review drafts for PM

I think one of the things the Worriers would need to accumulate over 
time, though I am sure the basic list can be created already from 
draft-farrell-perpass-attack, is a list of clues for practices and such 
that might be something to be worried about.

avri

On 29-Jan-14 08:55, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> One idea that came up in Vancouver and that we (meaning at least
> me:-) haven't had a chance to progress was the idea of trying to
> get a team of folks together to go do privacy reviews of existing
> RFCs. Or perhaps slightly differently, reviews that explicitly
> consider pervasive monitoring, which might be more constrained
> and a bit easier.
>
> I think Christian H. commented at the mic that there is probably
> a *lot* of low hanging fruit out there, and I suspect he's quite
> right:-)
>
> Now that we're in the run up to the London IETF, if some of you
> had time to try self-organise that kind of thing that'd be great.
> Any takers for trying to organise that?
>
> Using this list to start with should be fine, if it results in
> loads of traffic we can spin up a new one, or move over to
> ietf-privacy@ietf.org.
>
> If there are folks willing to take this on and having a
> side-meeting in London helps, I can get you a room for that.
>
> Thanks,
> S.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> perpass mailing list
> perpass@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
>
>