IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] draft-josefsson-email-received-privacy

"Christian Huitema" <huitema@huitema.net> Tue, 20 October 2015 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9A01B2C61 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XBpxF6NSqRGh for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xsmtp12.mail2web.com (xsmtp12.mail2web.com [168.144.250.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D081A1A50 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from internal.xmail10.myhosting.com ([10.5.2.35] helo=xmail10.myhosting.com) by xsmtp12.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1ZodWL-0007Lx-CC for perpass@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:29:08 -0400
Received: (qmail 2616 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2015 20:28:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO huitema1) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[167.220.100.17]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail10.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <linus@nordberg.se>; 20 Oct 2015 20:28:29 -0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
To: 'Linus Nordberg' <linus@nordberg.se>, perpass@ietf.org
References: <87r3kpmm25.fsf@nordberg.se>
In-Reply-To: <87r3kpmm25.fsf@nordberg.se>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:28:28 -0700
Message-ID: <011301d10b75$e1f19480$a5d4bd80$@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQEoZXbaREMHg/nZR5OmC2Ru2GkqLp/GHwow
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perpass/7EtTOTE7cNe_NBg2jgdUsm4BPuY>
Subject: Re: [perpass] draft-josefsson-email-received-privacy
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:30:48 -0000

Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 11:29 AM, Linus Nordberg wrote:
> ...
> draft-josefsson-email-received-privacy-00 has been submitted, see
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-josefsson-email-received-privacy/
> 
> I'd be interested in hearing what people on the perpass list think of
> this.

Happy to see this! The text about email's Received field metadata has been
in drafts leading to RFC 7624 for more than a year, and it is very good that
someone active in the email working groups actually proposes a solution.

Now for a suggestion. Maybe that's a difference in personal writing styles,
but I found the draft a bit dry. I would have appreciated a discussion of
the scenarios, and a bit of emphasis on the "submission" part, which is the
most concerning for privacy.

-- Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email