IETF Logo Mail Archive

[perpass] UTA charter (was: Re: Traffic peeking)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 25 November 2013 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464601ADBCB for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 06:24:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5H5hUF2aKfj for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 06:24:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3051AD9AD for <perpass@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 06:24:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A981FBE53; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:24:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X7n7p+VZ8-BA; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:24:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86432BE4C; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:24:36 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <52935DA5.90309@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:24:37 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, "Learmonth, Iain Ross" <iain.learmonth.09@aberdeen.ac.uk>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131124121510.0aa47e40@elandnews.com> <5e7d0e55fc83418aa2a9fbd86b0a9b5f@DB3PR01MB153.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20131124144605.0a990610@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131124144605.0a990610@elandnews.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: perpass@ietf.org
Subject: [perpass] UTA charter (was: Re: Traffic peeking)
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:24:38 -0000

On 11/25/2013 12:10 AM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> 
>> The other protocols will be discussed by the new uta (Using TLS in
>> Applications) working group[2].
> 
> I don't recall joining that mailing list.  I'll take a look at it.

I don't believe a list was setup for that just yet. The
charter was sent out for review on the IETF list [1] on
Friday last.

I'd say discussion of that charter would be best done on
apps-discuss@ietf.org since its proposed as an APPS area
WG and the apps-discuss list is probably where there's
the best concentration of relevant expertise, so please
direct any substantive discussion there.

Assuming the WG gets approved, which I'd expect, we'll be
able to chalk that one up as having being sufficiently
triaged here:-)

S.

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg12140.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email