Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff

On 01/29/2014 02:16 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
> First, what are the goals of getting organized? ☺ 

Fighting chaos chaotically:-)

> Some of us already
> consider privacy as a matter of course for new drafts (I do gen-art reviews
> in addition to WG reviews). I don't think we want to organize a group to
> comment on new material - it would be better get privacy/pm to be included
> in security considerations. 

Absolutely.

> My goal for a group would be to organize
> reviews of *existing* drafts/RFCs that are in common use. It shouldn't take
> a lot of work, maybe just a wiki page.

Yep. I expect that the first thing to do would be that, to
recruit some willing folks and then figure out what's doable
based on their expertise, interests and available cycles,
and on which RFCs that group figure might provide the
best payoffs, e.g. RFcs that the group figured are likely
to be revised/extended would probably be better targets
than things we think won't or can't be changed.

> 
> I'm enthusiastic about having a side meeting in London.

Cool. I bet a bit of f2f discussion could be fruitful
here if we can get some good folks in a room.

S.

> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> perpass mailing list
> perpass@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
> 