Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 03 February 2014 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5D21A00DC for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:34:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.085
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.085 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKwfrCgCHVuG for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:34:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F2A1A00E1 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:34:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D95E2802DF; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 16:34:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E13280277; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 16:34:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B739960001; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 16:34:22 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:34:22 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <20140203153422.GA3039@nic.fr>
References: <52E90863.5070805@cs.tcd.ie> <CAPv4CP9YfiOGQ_e+6=6U2rLgxQxAZGQPdQ=SDSYW2m90xLKtTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CF13C132.F673%alissa@cooperw.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CF13C132.F673%alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.3
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>, Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:34:54 -0000

On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 09:37:24AM -0800,
 Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote 
 a message of 109 lines which said:

> Just wanted to bring those reviews to people's attention in case
> they are helpful.

They are. IMHO, some of them should be turned in RFCs "Protocol X
privacy problem statement" and some could be used to make a Privacy
Considerations section in the next revision of the protocol.