Re: [perpass] perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <bruce@perens.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E612E1ADFBB for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:29:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vixaxx_x5VyJ for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alchemy.perens.com (alchemy.perens.com [206.221.219.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D361ADF46 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.18.131] (mail.a10networks.com [12.207.16.167]) by alchemy.perens.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2DFA50008A; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:29:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <529F90A0.8000706@perens.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:29:20 -0800
From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net>
References: <E2DA1477-C86E-441E-A33D-D47A0D67AFF3@iab.org> <EF9BD1E4-6EF3-4035-AC4E-1A2D3CADE615@mnot.net> <529E8494.7000806@perens.com> <20131204111309.GB11727@nic.fr> <529F61D8.6030105@perens.com> <20131204171207.GC19914@thunk.org> <529F63C0.3040804@perens.com> <529F88AC.3090904@appelbaum.net>
In-Reply-To: <529F88AC.3090904@appelbaum.net>
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, perpass@ietf.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [perpass] perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 20:29:23 -0000

On 12/04/2013 11:55 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
Dear Bruce,

Why do you dignify these actions as 'law enforcement' or even as
'national defense' when we're discussing illegal spying?
Because some of them are in my interest. And yours.

We have a nasty part of government that thinks it is in an an endless war. Every liberal nation, historically, discontinues its nice rights and protections during wartime.

But I don't kid myself that nothing that they are doing is done to protect me and others like me from a zillion nut-cases who conspire to do people harm and sometimes actually carry it out. I have met some of those nut-cases.

Every society chooses its balance between freedom and enforcement. Ours isn't the right balance today, agreed. But the proposals I see here are the hacker approach - we're not patient to deal with this as a political problem, so we'll change everyone's web browser.
Pervasive surveillance, censorship and malware is a serious threat regardless of your feelings about the NSA.
And will continue to be so after all web transactions are encrypted. You're not going to actually solve any problems.

    Thanks

    Bruce