IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group

Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com> Wed, 11 December 2013 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7781AE17D; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:48:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYU1zYu_rwi0; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:48:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x236.google.com (mail-pb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067F91AE154; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:48:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id un15so11002308pbc.27 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:48:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=g/uFLdeCHwhqZ8DsOtxNEZEoVwDWI/zhDaLnFcmteis=; b=jxXU35zKeppK8OXLpjIao/e+A19HPUrAo0rvUXtnqirCPIy/rilU5uorNGIk0Qh219 Ae+pkUbPJm6WXdGtxSdA5cHOELrVz2rSDGdx4B/cZiSapsm9zfEV6OA4S3OHIsKx1OzC h0KI9Vn6R/4w7iFWxL6cdZ0JKCCy+rUx5ftL652VxRuwKBoOLTgjfPttcVeiOlluINMi RzVhwvmoBie5hLRKcFXCzxymAo9H9ABF0VBBDVLjPNf4k6q/KHuBydpLMgco/fuOiKF0 MN1PE3M4RkvmnNfzkDUTuwKFUpAQOqK6tkRfaSWafOsDimvlMKsjwgk5g9btmskOCjP9 tkQQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.236.133 with SMTP id uu5mr5836245pbc.153.1386805715350; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:48:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.54] (107-0-5-6-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [107.0.5.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hw10sm35438286pbc.24.2013.12.11.15.48.32 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7668D34D-229A-4CED-916E-7CD7BBF2477B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABrd9SSYnBRtecDSwUZUjvKJPLB+XX6Kk_9NHtQ=X-5jo4jGxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:48:31 -0800
Message-Id: <C32FC8CD-7EA5-479B-89F4-88556301F14B@gmail.com>
References: <CABrd9STYF166vXEXNneJfPyfo5VG3LPKmzyZpAhvYnDTsy_U9g@mail.gmail.com> <52A8B1D0.2080304@dcrocker.net> <CABrd9SS9FGsm-waznAHeMr33XzprhRF=DXVjknyL-7bOyArAxg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwjNXpszKMqXr231Vti=pfwYn98Fgmuv1T5M__nhGmZHQw@mail.gmail.com> <CABrd9SSYnBRtecDSwUZUjvKJPLB+XX6Kk_9NHtQ=X-5jo4jGxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [perpass] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 23:48:42 -0000

On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> wrote:

> Agree, I just want to be able to refer to 6962 for what
> "cryptographically verifiable log" means.

Dear Ben,

There was an eXtensible Access Method, XAM, developed by SNIA.  This permitted vendors a means to implement strategies for handling massive amounts of data in a manner called Content Addressable Storage, such as EMC^2's Centera product. The data blobs create multiple secure hashes that act within a standardized label. The blobs are combined with timestamps and XML MIME tags. This removes a need for difficult to manage file hierarchy.  One of the benefits of this scheme is data can not change without detection.

SNIA now seems focused on identifying individuals.  Perhaps this is an outgrowth of their data-deduplication?
http://www.snia.org/tech_activities/standards/curr_standards/xam

Regards,
Douglas Otis

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status