[perpass] [iesg-secretary@ietf.org: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC]

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 31 January 2017 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCD31298CA for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:16:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vR25oMeRv98E for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94A381204D9 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EF2A2804B3 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:16:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E0D2803B9 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:16:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771E5B38004 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:16:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 746BC40018; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:16:43 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:16:43 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: perpass@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170131091643.iax2oiyiisozppsl@nic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="5gudsnxlhz6kgbm2"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.0
X-Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perpass/RusKP6RKcYcaKtrnTzwgZojrbQM>
Subject: [perpass] [iesg-secretary@ietf.org: Last Call: <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC]
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:16:51 -0000

Read and comment!
--- Begin Message ---
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Design considerations for Metadata Insertion'
  <draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05.txt> as Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-02-21. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   The IAB has published [RFC7624] in response to several revelations of
   pervasive attack on Internet communications.  This document considers
   the implications of protocol designs which associate metadata with
   encrypted flows.  In particular, it asserts that designs which do so
   by explicit actions of the end system are preferable to designs in
   which middleboxes insert them.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.

There are some minor nits noted by I-D nits that we'll fix as we go.


--- End Message ---