Re: [perpass] privacy implications of UUIDs for IoT devices

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 06 October 2016 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A531296F3 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 08:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0x3dK8V_SWJz for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 08:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D421296E8 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 08:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D51BE4C; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 16:54:34 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMs-1xFdFilr; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 16:54:34 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA8FABE47; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 16:54:33 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1475769274; bh=X8gdFcFc7Qb0PNk8CkHAdVjAJtP9kCr12aX3OWFpUq0=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=MGKxj/G0ORpWxqGVPAjpN2ci9mpyfRqdwp1Rt9BMnHR439pQquiVy+UcAJ927Y3hc GBzguLwxn7qEBxwKSTeXbKHfF6fYiY3bs322m/dpEyok9IOrvgfHspw9ZjpmDvHtZS v/XPaxa41AGsgHyduwLZUxrYx6/AtPv+T1lrVj/k=
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <5c32e81f-7e43-2bde-b8f4-46f08fecdefb@cs.tcd.ie> <db516334-43ab-e967-cfd5-87d920b65015@filament.com> <12e330d2-1097-7fba-1a9c-514e536878b0@cs.tcd.ie> <32752.1475762946@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <f858491d-3022-c22b-93e6-3c6601e168c9@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 16:54:32 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <32752.1475762946@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oSxp2oo7moOvGB2Isf82m0v4jAr5GhU0X"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perpass/UtBQfO4nUj2RvvTAHbX4AimfLLA>
Cc: perpass@ietf.org, Peter Saint-Andre - Filament <peter@filament.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [perpass] privacy implications of UUIDs for IoT devices
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:54:39 -0000


On 06/10/16 15:09, Michael Richardson wrote:

> I will volunteer, and I'll do this publically so that you'll hold me to it.
> Expect it by draft cut-off date.
> 

Excellent, thanks!

S.