IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C191AE120 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:57:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CqTejInyvB_d for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:57:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3CF1ADF84 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so16014123wes.1 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:57:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DKqBpO523DqsO7fGNv8Mn4up/LcOqs5CSB/J6pOZjw0=; b=XFIxQUIOLuClDvJksG0nqlfC8tMm2iWFnEedFUlXTm5OAUFVj9qA9W1Xd9H4xxPP/t k7yFuMVmsAGVC0i9etI0QIjNdadIlb5K5Y/GwYPKPOgAxk2KY8FpvbCwvgw4F0DnbSaT l9sVxVGYcAnsY/LsG53iX3LO7GyE96O0O+v4VTjjCb5tmFSsgfaHdFMQj3qCp8u0lr60 jTwoFknJU+3zSw9omvsuI2Him58Ak0qZDTGezuRlzqyX5z80JtfPaOHHSZZZcBZb/4zB QqsYiD5LlQZ2sb/g4wV1dlJ+fjpROmEeLWE88Vw1lLKg2y3GPH3SZ7xroew0fqD9jPrW yTow==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.109.201 with SMTP id hu9mr9201859wib.59.1386197825387; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:57:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.243.136 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:57:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <529FB216.7010504@perens.com>
References: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E5103799@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <2C66A416-5F07-4803-A4C0-BB61734BA42E@nominum.com> <529FB216.7010504@perens.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:57:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwjyp2eiVyqujnxiad9+iqUjkbJDhshB3+g-8fWkwgc5Vg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f2356bdf88b8f04ecbd54eb"
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:57:11 -0000

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> wrote:

>  On 12/04/2013 02:42 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
> I take it you haven't been reading the responses to Bruce's essay, or you
> would have seen that these points have already been discussed and refuted.
>
> That might have been an accurate statement if this were a technical
> discussion rather than a political one. We saw opposing viewpoints.
> Opposition isn't refutation.
>

When someone starts accusing everyone of treason it isn't so much
refutation that is appropriate as the men in white coats.

-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email