Re: [perpass] privacy/PM reviews of existing stuff

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 1/29/2014 5:55 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> One idea that came up in Vancouver and that we (meaning at least
> me:-) haven't had a chance to progress was the idea of trying to
> get a team of folks together to go do privacy reviews of existing
> RFCs. Or perhaps slightly differently, reviews that explicitly
> consider pervasive monitoring, which might be more constrained
> and a bit easier.
...
> Now that we're in the run up to the London IETF, if some of you
> had time to try self-organise that kind of thing that'd be great.
> Any takers for trying to organise that?


Doing reviews for attention to PM is really an experimental activity. 
We don't have a track record of those specific types of reviews and I 
believe we are some distance away from having a shared, usable model of 
what to review for.

But we do need to develop it.

So I think what you are proposing actually ought to be its own 
development project, with the goal of producing a document in the realm 
of "Guidelines for doing Pervasive Monitoring Reviews of IETF 
Specifications."

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net