Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 19 August 2013 00:08 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 75C4111E8198 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3CnS+MXWYL72 for
<perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E709421F994C for <perpass@ietf.org>;
Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by
ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id
1VBD1D-0003M7-Ae; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:08:23 +0000
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:08:22 +0900
Message-ID: <m2zjsea6fd.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
In-Reply-To: <5210F9D3.5010302@bluepopcorn.net>
References: <520FE08B.80005@bluepopcorn.net>
<alpine.LFD.2.10.1308171723400.14413@bofh.nohats.ca>
<5210643F.8030709@bluepopcorn.net> <m2bo4vcuup.wl%randy@psg.com>
<Pine.SGI.4.61.1308180959010.1312964@shell01.TheWorld.com>
<5210F9D3.5010302@bluepopcorn.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: perpass@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for discussion of the privacy properties of IETF
protocols and concrete ways in which those could be improved. "
<perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>,
<mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>,
<mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:08:25 -0000
> What I'm proposing is slightly different. We would still encrypt (at > transport level) all messages when that's possible and the nsa pwns the disk drives of the smtp relays. e2e, please, in addition to transport. in 1984, all data and traffic should be encrypted. randy
- [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Jim Fenton
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Paul Wouters
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Jim Fenton
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Randy Bush
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Dan Schlitt
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Jim Fenton
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Stephen Farrell
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Jim Fenton
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Yoav Nir
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Randy Bush
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Jim Fenton
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Jim Fenton
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Randy Bush
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Randy Bush
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Jim Fenton
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Randy Bush
- Re: [perpass] Another mail-related proposal Jim Fenton